Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;23(8):889-94.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1108-7. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

Interobserver reliability of the radiographic assessment of cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Affiliations

Interobserver reliability of the radiographic assessment of cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Abdulaziz Al-Ahaideb et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of a modified quantitative Barrack Cement grading in primary THA. Previous studies demonstrated both poor intraobserver and interobserver reliability which may be due to the qualitative nature of the scale.

Methods: Interobserver reliability of the Barrack Cement Grading System in its original format and then in combination with a quantitative measurement of implant/cement lengths was evaluated on 50 immediate post-operative radiographs of primary cemented arthroplasties. Intraobserver reliability was also assessed on a sub-sample of radiographs. Three evaluators with different skill levels and specialty participated: an arthroplasty surgeon, an orthopaedic resident and a radiologist. Reliability was measured using a weighted kappa coefficient for paired comparisons among the evaluators.

Results: Interobserver reliability was poor (κ < 0.10) for all pairings of the Barrack System. The modified quantitative system achieved slight (κ < 0.20) to poor reliability. Intraobserver reliability was dependent on the skill and specialty of the evaluator with maximal values achieved for the experienced arthroplasty surgeon using the modified quantitative system (κ = 0.62).

Conclusion: Use of the modified scale may improve the reliability of ratings when used by individual experienced arthroplasty surgeons.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Apr;11(3):272-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):191-4 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May;74(3):385-9 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Aug;11(5):525-8 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1998 Jun;13(4):396-401 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources