Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans
- PMID: 23418419
- PMCID: PMC3572122
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052970
Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans
Abstract
Liberals and conservatives exhibit different cognitive styles and converging lines of evidence suggest that biology influences differences in their political attitudes and beliefs. In particular, a recent study of young adults suggests that liberals and conservatives have significantly different brain structure, with liberals showing increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex, and conservatives showing increased gray matter volume in the in the amygdala. Here, we explore differences in brain function in liberals and conservatives by matching publicly-available voter records to 82 subjects who performed a risk-taking task during functional imaging. Although the risk-taking behavior of Democrats (liberals) and Republicans (conservatives) did not differ, their brain activity did. Democrats showed significantly greater activity in the left insula, while Republicans showed significantly greater activity in the right amygdala. In fact, a two parameter model of partisanship based on amygdala and insula activations yields a better fitting model of partisanship than a well-established model based on parental socialization of party identification long thought to be one of the core findings of political science. These results suggest that liberals and conservatives engage different cognitive processes when they think about risk, and they support recent evidence that conservatives show greater sensitivity to threatening stimuli.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–375. - PubMed
-
- Kam CD, Simas EN (2010) Risk orientations and policy frames. The Journal of Politics 72: 381–396.
-
- Jost JT (2006) The end of the end of ideology. Am Psychol 61: 651–670. - PubMed
-
- Converse P (1964) The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Apter D, editor. Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press. 206–261.
-
- Oxley DR, Smith KB, Alford JR, Hibbing MV, Miller JL, et al. (2008) Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 321: 1667–1670. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
