Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 May-Jun;5(3):218-24.
doi: 10.1007/BF02600538.

Use of an outpatient medical record audit to achieve educational objectives: changes in residents' performances over six years

Affiliations

Use of an outpatient medical record audit to achieve educational objectives: changes in residents' performances over six years

D E Kern et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a process whereby a faculty-resident committee annually audits outpatient record keeping and preventive care practices and provides feedback to resident physicians.

Design: Pre- and postfeedback audits with interventions and observations repeated over six consecutive academic years.

Setting: The adult primary care practice of housestaff in a university-affiliated hospital.

Subjects: All 139 physicians in an internal medicine residency program from 1981-82 through 1986-87, of whom 37 were present for three consecutive years.

Intervention: Each year, residents were given individualized, detailed, typewritten feedback based on audits of their outpatient records.

Measurements and main results: Each resident physician had a minimum of four (mean 5.2) outpatient records per year audited against standards for record-keeping practices and the provision of preventive care. Overall performance scores for each resident audit improved from a mean of 39.7 +/- 12.3 (SD) in 1981-82 to a mean of 58.5 +/- 14.1 (SD) in 1986-87 (possible range 0 to 100, observed range 9.4 to 86.6). The overall performance scores of individual residents, who received two cycles of feedback, improved an average of 11.5 (95% confidence limits 7.6, 15.3), from a mean of 48.4 +/- 11.4 (SD) during their first year of residency to 59.8 +/- 13.9 (SD) during their third year. General (primary care) and traditional-track residents improved at similar rates, although mean performance scores were consistently higher for general than for traditional-track residents. Analysis of variance revealed that all changes and differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions: An ongoing chart audit and feedback system can be associated with improvements both in the performance of individual residents and in the long-term performance of a residency program.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Nov;144(11):2167-70 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1983 Dec;21(12):1144-53 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1984 Mar;74(3):223-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Educ. 1976 Jan;10(1):33-42 - PubMed
    1. J Fam Pract. 1980 Mar;10(3):487-90 - PubMed

Publication types