Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 14:3:480.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00480. eCollection 2012.

Modeling tumor evolutionary dynamics

Affiliations

Modeling tumor evolutionary dynamics

Beatriz Stransky et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Tumorigenesis can be seen as an evolutionary process, in which the transformation of a normal cell into a tumor cell involves a number of limiting genetic and epigenetic events, occurring in a series of discrete stages. However, not all mutations in a cell are directly involved in cancer development and it is likely that most of them (passenger mutations) do not contribute in any way to tumorigenesis. Moreover, the process of tumor evolution is punctuated by selection of advantageous (driver) mutations and clonal expansions. Regarding these driver mutations, it is uncertain how many limiting events are required and/or sufficient to promote a tumorigenic process or what are the values associated with the adaptive advantage of different driver mutations. In spite of the availability of high-quality cancer data, several assumptions about the mechanistic process of cancer initiation and development remain largely untested, both mathematically and statistically. Here we review the development of recent mathematical/computational models and discuss their impact in the field of tumor biology.

Keywords: modeling; mutation; somatic mutations; tumor; tumorigenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of branching process model of cell division, as proposed by Bozic et al. (2010). According to a specific probabilistic distribution, each cell can either (1) die, (2) divide without acquisition of a new mutation, or (3) divide with acquisition of a new driver mutation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Armitage P., Doll R. (1954). The age distribution of cancer and a multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer 8, 1–12 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armitage P., Doll R. (1957). A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer. Br. J. Cancer 11, 161–169 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong B., Doll R. (1975). Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int. J. Cancer 15, 617–631 - PubMed
    1. Ashley D. J. (1969). The two “hit” and multiple “hit” theories of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer 23, 313–328 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attolini C. S., Michor F. (2009). Evolutionary theory of cancer. Annu. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1168, 23–51 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04880.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources