Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke
- PMID: 23422082
- PMCID: PMC3609884
- DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671
Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke
Abstract
Background and purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures have been found useful in many disciplines but have received limited evaluation after stroke. The current study investigated the relationship that patient-reported measures have with standard impairment and disability scales after stroke.
Methods: Patients with motor deficits after stroke were scored on standard assessments including the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and Fugl-Meyer motor scale, and on 2 patient-reported measures, the hand function domain of the Stroke Impact Scale, which documents difficulty of hand motor usage, and the amount of use portion of the Motor Activity Log, which records amount of arm motor usage.
Results: The 43 participants had mild disability (median modified Rankin Scale=2), moderate motor deficits (Fugl-Meyer motor scale=46 ± 22), and mild cognitive/language deficits. The 2 patient-reported outcome measures, Stroke Impact Scale and Motor Activity Log, were sensitive to the presence of arm motor deficits. Of 21 patients classified as having minimal or no impairment or disability by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale or modified Rankin Scale (score of 0-1), 15 (71%) reported difficulty with hand movements by the Stroke Impact Scale score or reduced arm use by the Motor Activity Log score. Furthermore, of 14 patients with a normal examination, 10 (71%) reported difficulty with hand movements or reduction in arm use.
Conclusions: Patient-reported measures were a unique source of insight into clinical status in the current population. Motor deficits were revealed in a majority of patients classified by standard scales as having minimal or no disability, and in a majority of patients classified as having no deficits.
Figures
Comment in
-
Response to letter regarding article, "patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke".Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):e80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001705. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Stroke. 2013. PMID: 23735954 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Stinear and Byblow regarding article, "patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke".Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):e79. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001689. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Stroke. 2013. PMID: 23735958 No abstract available.
References
-
- Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313–319. - PubMed
-
- Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009;4:200–205. - PubMed
-
- Savitz SI, Benatar M, Saver JL, Fisher M. Outcome analysis in clinical trial design for acute stroke: Physicians’ attitudes and choices. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26:156–162. - PubMed
-
- The national institute of neurological disorders and stroke rt-pa stroke study group Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
