Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 23424284
- PMCID: PMC3570551
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481
Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials
Abstract
The quality of reporting of animal studies lags behind that of human randomized controlled trials but a series of additions to the ARRIVE guidelines will help ensure that the standards are comparable.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J (2007) Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol 60: 241–249. - PubMed
-
- Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, et al. (2006) Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 185: 263–267. - PubMed
-
- Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8: e1000412 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MFW, Cuthill IC, et al. (2009) Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS ONE 4: e7824 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007824. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources