Negligence, genuine error, and litigation
- PMID: 23426783
- PMCID: PMC3576054
- DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S24256
Negligence, genuine error, and litigation
Abstract
Not all medical injuries are the result of negligence. In fact, most medical injuries are the result either of the inherent risk in the practice of medicine, or due to system errors, which cannot be prevented simply through fear of disciplinary action. This paper will discuss the differences between adverse events, negligence, and system errors; the current medical malpractice tort system in the United States; and review current and future solutions, including medical malpractice reform, alternative dispute resolution, health courts, and no-fault compensation systems. The current political environment favors investigation of non-cap tort reform remedies; investment into more rational oversight systems, such as health courts or no-fault systems may reap both quantitative and qualitative benefits for a less costly and safer health system.
Keywords: alternative dispute resolution; medical malpractice; no fault compensation; system errors; tort reform.
References
-
- Thornton T, Saha S. The need for tort reform as part of health care reform. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2008;18:321–327. - PubMed
-
- Edwards’ malpractice suits leave bitter taste. The Washington Times. Aug 16, 2004. Available at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/aug/16/20040816-011234-1949r/?p....
-
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1999. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
