'Miscarriage or abortion?' Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective
- PMID: 23429567
- PMCID: PMC3841747
- DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2012-010284
'Miscarriage or abortion?' Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective
Abstract
Clinical language applied to early pregnancy loss changed in late twentieth century Britain when doctors consciously began using the term 'miscarriage' instead of 'abortion' to refer to this subject. Medical professionals at the time and since have claimed this change as an intuitive empathic response to women's experiences. However, a reading of medical journals and textbooks from the era reveals how the change in clinical language reflected legal, technological, professional and social developments. The shift in language is better understood in the context of these historical developments, rather than as the consequence of more empathic medical care for women who experience miscarriage.
Keywords: History; Linguistics; Medical imaging.
Figures
References
-
- Beard RW, Mowbray JF, Pinker GD. Miscarriage or abortion? Lancet 1985:2:1122–23 - PubMed
-
- Chalmers B. Terminology used in early pregnancy loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:357–8 - PubMed
-
- Chamberlain G. Nomenclature: what is your name? BMJ 1997;314:1684
-
- Lee E. Abortion law and politics today. London: Macmillan, 1998:5–94
-
- Franklin S, Lury C, Stacey J. Off Centre: feminism and cultural studies. London: Harper Collins Academic, 1991:129–218
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical