Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 25:13:5.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-5.

Prognostic factors for corneal graft recovery after severe corneal graft rejection following penetrating keratoplasty

Affiliations

Prognostic factors for corneal graft recovery after severe corneal graft rejection following penetrating keratoplasty

Katsuya Yamazoe et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors for corneal graft recovery after severe corneal graft rejection following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) treated with topical and systemic steroids.

Methods: Fifty-eight eyes in 58 patients with severe corneal graft rejection following PKP were treated with topical and systemic steroids. Factors affecting the reversibility and maintenance of graft transparency were analyzed.

Results: Graft transparency was restored in 37 of 58 eyes (63.8%). Clarity of the graft was maintained in 25 of 37 eyes after transparency was restored, while corneal decompensation developed at a mean of 6.0 ± 4.3 months in the remainder. The interval between rejection and treatment with systemic steroids was shorter in cases that recovered graft transparency (OR, 0.88, 95% CI. 0.80-0.97, P = 0.0093). Corneal decompensation after the recovery of corneal transparency tend to occur in cases of regraft (OR, 0.09, 95% CI. 0.01-0.54, P = 0.0091).

Conclusions: Severe corneal graft rejection after PKP was reversible in approximately two-thirds of the cases, with graft transparency being maintained in two-thirds of them when treated with both topical and systemic steroids. Early treatment confers a benefit in terms of the recovery of graft transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34:325–356. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(90)90110-H. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Eastly DL, Rogers CA. Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:120–127. - PubMed
    1. Inoue K, Amano S, Oshika T, Tsuru T. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:251–255. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790308.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein AJ, De Castro TN, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ. Risk factors for the first episode of corneal graft rejection in keratoconus. Cornea. 2006;25:1005–1011. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000240098.01468.4c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachmann B, Taylor RS, Cursiefen C. Corneal neovascularisation as a risk factor for graft failure and rejection after keratoplasty: an evidence-based meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1300–1305. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.039. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources