Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb 22:13:28.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-28.

Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Ralf Schmidmaier  1 , Stephan Eiber, Rene Ebersbach, Miriam Schiller, Inga Hege, Matthias Holzer, Martin R Fischer
Affiliations

Learning the facts in medical school is not enough: which factors predict successful application of procedural knowledge in a laboratory setting?

Ralf Schmidmaier et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Medical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or "what" information) and procedural knowledge ("how" and "why" information). Conceptual knowledge is known to be an essential prerequisite for clinical problem solving. Primarily, medical students learn from textbooks and often struggle with the process of applying their conceptual knowledge to clinical problems. Recent studies address the question of how to foster the acquisition of procedural knowledge and its application in medical education. However, little is known about the factors which predict performance in procedural knowledge tasks. Which additional factors of the learner predict performance in procedural knowledge?

Methods: Domain specific conceptual knowledge (facts) in clinical nephrology was provided to 80 medical students (3rd to 5th year) using electronic flashcards in a laboratory setting. Learner characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. Procedural knowledge in clinical nephrology was assessed by key feature problems (KFP) and problem solving tasks (PST) reflecting strategic and conditional knowledge, respectively.

Results: Results in procedural knowledge tests (KFP and PST) correlated significantly with each other. In univariate analysis, performance in procedural knowledge (sum of KFP+PST) was significantly correlated with the results in (1) the conceptual knowledge test (CKT), (2) the intended future career as hospital based doctor, (3) the duration of clinical clerkships, and (4) the results in the written German National Medical Examination Part I on preclinical subjects (NME-I). After multiple regression analysis only clinical clerkship experience and NME-I performance remained independent influencing factors.

Conclusions: Performance in procedural knowledge tests seems independent from the degree of domain specific conceptual knowledge above a certain level. Procedural knowledge may be fostered by clinical experience. More attention should be paid to the interplay of individual clinical clerkship experiences and structured teaching of procedural knowledge and its assessment in medical education curricula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of diagnostic knowledge and assessment according to van Gog [5]and Kopp [7,13].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Learning (A) and Assessment (B) Tools.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Performance in CKT, KFP and PST (B) and correlation between procedural knowledge tests.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Considine J, Botti M, Thomas S. Do knowledge and experience have specific roles in triage decision-making? Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:722–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01869.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wimmers PF, Splinter TA, Hancock GR, Schmidt HG. Clinical competence: general ability or case-specific? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12:299–314. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9002-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wimmers PF, Fung CC. The impact of case specificity and generalisable skills on clinical performance: a correlated traits-correlated methods approach. Med Educ. 2008;42:580–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03089.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krathwohl DR. A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice. 2002;41:212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2. - DOI
    1. van Gog T, Paas F, van Merrienboer JJG. Process-oriented worked examples: improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instr Sci. 2004;32:83–98.

LinkOut - more resources