Recruitment, retention, and blinding in clinical trials
- PMID: 23433269
- PMCID: PMC3722651
- DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006197
Recruitment, retention, and blinding in clinical trials
Abstract
The recruitment and retention of participants and the blinding of participants, health care providers, and data collectors present challenges for clinical trial investigators. This article reviews challenges and alternative strategies associated with these three important clinical trial activities. Common recruiting pitfalls, including low sample size, unfriendly study designs, suboptimal testing locations, and untimely recruitment are discussed together with strategies for overcoming these barriers. The use of active controls, technology-supported visit reminders, and up-front scheduling is recommended to prevent attrition and maximize retention of participants. Blinding is conceptualized as the process of concealing research design elements from key players in the research process. Strategies for blinding participants, health care providers, and data collectors are suggested.
Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
Figures
References
-
- American Occupational Therapy Association. 2007. AOTA’s Centennial Vision and executive summary. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 613–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.6.613 .
-
- Bedlack R. S., Cudkowicz M. E. Clinical trials in progressive neurological diseases: Recruitment, enrollment, retention and compliance. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience. 2009;25:144–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000209493 . - PubMed
-
- Britton A., Murray D., Bulstrode C., McPherson K., Denham R. Loss to follow-up: Does it matter. Lancet. 1995;345:1511–1512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91071-9 . - PubMed
-
- Cooley M. E., Sarna L., Brown J. K., Williams R. D., Chernecky C., Padilla G., Danao L. L. Challenges of recruitment and retention in multisite clinical research. Cancer Nursing. 2003;26:376–384. quiz 385–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200310000-00006 . - PubMed
-
- Corrigan P. W., Salzer M. S. The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: Implications for internal validity. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26:109–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00014-4 . - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
