Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 15;119(10):1800-7.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.27990. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries

Affiliations

Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries

Gregory S Cooper et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Professional society guidelines recommend follow-up colonoscopy for patients with resected colonic adenomas. However, adherence to guideline recommendations in routine clinical practice has not been well characterized.

Methods: The authors used a population-based sample of Medicare beneficiaries to identify all patients aged ≥70 years who had a claim for colonoscopy with polypectomy or hot biopsy during the period from 2001 to 2004. Medicare claims through 2009 identified colonoscopy within the following 5 years as well as fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema.

Results: In total, 12,771 patients were included. At 5 years, 45.7% of patients underwent another colonoscopy, and 32.3% of procedures included a polypectomy. The rates of fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema at 5 years were 54%, 3.8%, and 2.9%, respectively. There was a marked decrease in repeat colonoscopy at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years with more recent years of index procedures. Other predictors of undergoing repeat colonoscopy were younger age, African American race, and a colonoscopy before the index examination. There was no association with physician specialty. The decreasing use of colonoscopy with time was maintained in a multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: In a sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries, there was under use of follow-up colonoscopy at 5 years after polypectomy, and <50% of patients received a repeat examination. In particular, the use of this procedure decreased over the 4-year study period. Coupled with other data indicating the overuse of follow-up colonoscopy in patients without polyps, there appeared to be significant discordance between guidelines and actual practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curve showing the proportion of patients with previous polypectomy undergoing repeat colonoscopy in follow up stratified by the presence or absence of previous risk factors for neoplasia (prior polyp, family history of colon cancer). There was a significantly greater use of colonoscopy in patients with risk factors (p<0.0001).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves of the receipt of repeat colonoscopy following polypectomy stratified by year of index polypectomy. The frequency decreased with later years of the index colonoscopy (p<0.0001).

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. - PubMed
    1. Levine JS, Ahnen DJ. Adenomatous polyps of the colon. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2551–2557. - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642. - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–1875. - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms