Criterion-related validity of the Anorectic Cognitions Questionnaire

Abstract

Several authors have suggested core cognitive dysfunction as central to anorexia and bulimia nervosa. However, psychometrically sound assessment devices for these cognitions are notably lacking. Previous research with the Anorectic Cognitions Questionnaire (MAC) has suggested that it has good concurrent and criterion-related validity, and high internal consistency. As well, the factor structure has been supported. The purpose of this investigation was to further assess the criterion-related validity of the MAC. Male and female college students completed the MAC and a questionnaire about eating and weight-related behavior and attitudes in four areas: general emphasis on weight regulation, relative importance of specific benefits of losing or maintaining weight (i.e., psychological, appearance, and health benefits), use of calorie restriction strategies, and use of calorie burning strategies. In general, persons scoring above the mean on the MAC showed more evidence of pathological eating attitudes and behavior in all four areas.