Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD009192.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009192.pub2.

Telephone communication of HIV testing results for improving knowledge of HIV infection status

Lorainne Tudor Car  1 , Sarah Gentry, Michelle H M M T van-Velthoven, Josip Car
Affiliations

Telephone communication of HIV testing results for improving knowledge of HIV infection status

Lorainne Tudor Car et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: This is one of three Cochrane reviews that examine the role of the telephone in HIV/AIDS services. Both in developed and developing countries there is a large proportion of people who do not know they are infected with HIV. Knowledge of one's own HIV serostatus is necessary to access HIV support, care and treatment and to prevent acquisition or further transmission of HIV. Using telephones instead of face-to-face or other means of HIV test results delivery could lead to more people receiving their HIV test results.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of telephone use for delivery of HIV test results and post-test counselling.To evaluate the effectiveness of delivering HIV test results by telephone, we were interested in whether they can increase the proportion of people who receive their HIV test results and the number of people knowing their HIV status.

Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed Central, PsycINFO, ISI Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), WHOs The Global Health Library and Current Controlled Trials from 1980 to June 2011. We also searched grey literature sources such as Dissertation Abstracts International,CAB Direct Global Health, OpenSIGLE, The Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Google Scholar, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, International AIDS Society and AEGIS Education Global Information System, and reference lists of relevant studies for this review.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised controlled trials (qRCTs), controlled before and after studies (CBAs), and interrupted time series (ITS) studies comparing the effectiveness of telephone HIV test results notification and post-test counselling to face-to-face or other ways of HIV test result delivery in people regardless of their demographic characteristics and in all settings.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently searched, screened, assessed study quality and extracted data. A third reviewer resolved any disagreement.

Main results: Out of 14 717 citations, only one study met the inclusion criteria; an RCT conducted on homeless and high-risk youth between September 1998 and October 1999 in Portland, United States. Participants (n=351) were offered counselling and oral HIV testing and were randomised into face-to-face (n=187 participants) and telephone (n=167) notification groups. The telephone notification group had the option of receiving HIV test results either by telephone or face-to-face. Overall, only 48% (n=168) of participants received their HIV test results and post-test counselling. Significantly more participants received their HIV test results in the telephone notification group compared to the face-to-face notification group; 58% (n=106) vs. 37% (n=62) (p < 0.001). In the telephone notification group, the majority of participants who received their HIV test results did so by telephone (88%, n=93). The study could not offer information about the effectiveness of telephone HIV test notification with HIV-positive participants because only two youth tested positive and both were assigned to the face-to-face notification group. The study had a high risk of bias.

Authors' conclusions: We found only one eligible study. Although this study showed the use of the telephone for HIV test results notification was more effective than face-to-face delivery, it had a high-risk of bias. The study was conducted about 13 years ago in a high-income country, on a high-risk population, with low HIV prevalence, and the applicability of its results to other settings and contexts is unclear. The study did not provide information about telephone HIV test results notification of HIV positive people since none of the intervention group participants were HIV positive. We found no information about the acceptability of the intervention to patients' and providers', its economic outcomes or potential adverse effects. There is a need for robust evidence from various settings on the effectiveness of telephone use for HIV test results notification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Tsu 2002 {published data only}
    1. Tsu RC, Burm ML, Gilhooly JA, Sells CW. Telephone vs. face‐to‐face notification of HIV results in high‐risk youth. The Journal of Adolescent Health 2002;30(3):154‐60. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Frank 1997 {published data only}
    1. Frank AP, Wandell MG, Headings MD, Conant MA, Woody GE, Michel C. Anonymous HIV testing using home collection and telemedicine counseling. A multicenter evaluation. Archives of internal medicine 1997;157(3):309‐14.. - PubMed

Additional references

Bunn 2005
    1. Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice 2005;55:956‐61. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2003
    1. Car J, Sheikh A. Telephone consultations. British Medical Journal 2003;326:966‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Car 2004
    1. Car J, Freeman GK, Partridge MR, Sheikh A. Improving quality and safety of telephone based delivery of care: teaching telephone consultation skills. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2004;13:2‐3. - PMC - PubMed
CDC 2006
    1. CDC. Revised Recommendations for HIV Testing of Adults, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women in Health‐Care Settings. 2006. - PubMed
EPOC 1998
    1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Draft EPOC Methods Paper: Including Interrupted Time Series (ITS) Designs in a EPOC Review. 1998.
EPOC 2002
    1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group: Data Collection Checklist. 2002.
EPOC 2009
    1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Risk of Bias. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐resources‐review‐authors 2009.
Foster 1999
    1. Foster J, Jessopp L, Dale J. Concerns and confidence of general practitioners in providing telephone consultations. British Journal of General Practice 1999;49:111‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Gentry 2012
    1. Gentry S, Velthoven MH, Tudor Car L, Car J. Telephone delivered interventions for reducing morbidity and mortality in people with HIV infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012. - PMC - PubMed
Gurol‐Urganci 2008
    1. Gurol‐Urganci I, Jongh T, Vodopivec‐Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008. - PMC - PubMed
Healey 2010
    1. Healey LM, O'Connor CC, Templeton DJ. HIV result giving. Is it time to change our thinking?. Sexual Health 2010;7:8‐10. - PubMed
Higgins 2009
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2009.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. 2011.
Higgs 2003
    1. Higgs R, Blache G, Peters M, Armstrong E, Jessopp L. Telephone consultation requires appropriate training. BMJ 2003;327:53. - PMC - PubMed
HPA 2010
    1. HPA. HIV in the United Kingdom: 2010 Report. 2010; Vol. 4.
Hutchinson 2006
    1. Hutchinson AB, Branson BM, Kim A, Farnham PG. A meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of alternative HIV counseling and testing methods to increase knowledge of HIV status. AIDS 2006;20(12):1597‐604.. - PubMed
ITU‐D 2010
    1. ITU‐D. THE WORLD IN 2010 FACTS AND FIGURES. Market Information and Statistics Division Telecommunication Development Bureau International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2010.
Lattimer 1998
    1. Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, Thomas E, Mullee M, Turnbull J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 1998;317:1054‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Lester 2006
    1. Lester RT, Gelmon L, Plummer FA. Cell phones: tightening the communication gap in resource‐limited antiretroviral programmes?. Aids 2006;20:2242‐4. - PubMed
McKinstry 2007
    1. McKinstry LA, Goldbaum GM, Meischke HW. Telephone notification of HIV test results: Impact in king County, Washington. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2007;34:796‐800. - PubMed
Noar 2012
    1. Noar SM, Willoughby JF. eHealth interventions for HIV prevention. AIDS Care 2012;24(8):945‐52. - PMC - PubMed
Pinnock 2007
    1. Pinnock H, Slack R, Sheikh A. Misconnecting for health: (lack of) advice for professionals on the safe mobile phone technology. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2007;16:162‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Schulter 1996
    1. Schluter WW, Judson FN, Baron AE, McGill WL, Marine WM, Douglas JM Jr. Usefulness of human immunodeficiency virus post‐test counseling by telephone for low‐risk clients of an urban sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1996;23:190–7. - PubMed
Sokol 2006
    1. Sokol D, Car J. Protecting patient confidentiality in telephone consultations in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2006;56(529):384‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Sullivan 2004
    1. Sullivan P S, Lansky A, Drake A, Investigators Hits‐. Failure to return for HIV test results among persons at high risk for HIV infection ‐ Results from a multistate interview project. Jaids 2004;35:511‐8. - PubMed
van Velthoven 2012a
    1. Velthoven MH, Car Tudor L, Car J, Atun R. Telephone Consultation for Improving Health of People Living with or at Risk of HIV: A Systematic Review. PLoS One 2012;7(5):e36105. - PMC - PubMed
van Velthoven 2012b
    1. Velthoven MH, Tudor Car L, Gentry S, Car J. Telephone‐delivered interventions for preventing HIV infection in HIV‐negative persons. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012. - PMC - PubMed
WHA 2005
    1. WHA. WHA58.28 eHealth. 2005.
WHO 2010
    1. WHO. Towards Universal access Scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector ‐ 2010 Progress report. 2010.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources