Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;40(3):430-442.
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.011.

Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study

Affiliations

Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study

Jelena Krivokapić et al. J Phon. .

Abstract

This study examines the production and perception of Intonational Phrase (IP) boundaries. In particular, it investigates (1) whether the articulatory events that occur at IP boundaries can exhibit temporal distinctions that would indicate a difference in degree of disjuncture, and (2) to what extent listeners are sensitive to the effects of such differences among IP boundaries. Two experiments investigate these questions. An articulatory kinematic experiment examines the effects of structural differences between IP boundaries on the production of those boundaries. In a perception experiment listeners then evaluate the strength of the junctures occurring in the utterances produced in the production study. The results of the studies provide support for the existence of prosodic strength differences among IP boundaries and also demonstrate a close link between the production and perception of prosodic boundaries. The results are discussed in the context of possible linguistic structural explanations, with implications for cognitive accounts for the creation, implementation, and processing of prosody.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of the identified landmark events and the derived variables. The vertical lines show the identified landmarks (as described in the text). The horizontal full lines show the identified variables, and the dotted lines the acceleration durations (C1 opening movement acceleration duration and C2 closing movement deceleration duration).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Interaction of boundary and speaker effects on boundary strength perception, means (z-scores) and standard errors.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prosodic structures for sentences 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beckman ME, Ayers Elam GA. Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Version 3.0, unpublished ms. 1997 Available online at: < http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf>.
    1. Beckman ME, Hirschberg J, Shattuck-Hufnagel S. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In: Jun S-A, editor. Prosodic typology The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 9–54.
    1. Beckman ME, Pierrehumbert JB. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook. 1986;3:255–309.
    1. Byrd D. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica. 2000;57:3–16. - PubMed
    1. Byrd D. Relating prosody and dynamic events: Commentary on the papers by Cho, Navas, and Smiljanić. In: Goldstein L, Whalen DH, Best C, editors. Laboratory phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence. Mouton de Gruyter; 2006. pp. 549–561.

LinkOut - more resources