In vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam combination against gram negative bacilli
- PMID: 23441486
In vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam combination against gram negative bacilli
Abstract
Cefoperazone is a â-lactam antimicrobial and Sulbactam is an irreversible â-lactamase inhibitor. The objective of this study was to know the susceptibility pattern of gram negative bacilli (GNB) towards cefoperazone-sulbactum. All GNB isolated from different clinical samples during the period of May, 2010 to Aug, 2010 were tested for susceptibility to cefoperazone-sulbactum, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, chloromphenicol, cotrimoxazole, ampicillin, amikacin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, carbenicillin and piperacillin using standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method. The susceptibilities were recorded according to CLSI guidelines. A total of 406 GNB were isolated (urine: 66.7%, pus: 19.2%, and blood: 7.9%). Escherichia coli (54.4%) was most frequently isolated organisms followed by Acinetobacter species (17.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.1%) and Pseudomonas species (6.1%). Overall, 11.8% of isolates showed resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam. Frequencies of isolates showing resistance to meropenem and amikacin were 14.7% and 26.25% respectively. Only 3.9% of Escherichia coli isolates showed resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam. For other organisms, their lowest frequency ranging from 0-20%, exhibited resistance to meropenem. In Pseudomonas spp, in-vitro activity of amikacin was also better as only 11.1% isolates showed resistance to it. This study demonstrated the in-vitro synergistic effect of cefoperazonerazone-sulbactam and meropenem having good activity against GNB compared to the activity of other commonly tested antimicrobials. Cefoperazone-sulbactam can be recommended for the clinical practice against GNB exhibiting resistant to other antimicrobials as it is cheaper alternative to meropenem. Our results also focused on the continuous surveillance of the trends and features of resistance of common antimicrobials.
Similar articles
-
[Changes of antimicrobial resistance among nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from intensive care units from 1994 to 2001 in China].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Mar 10;83(5):385-90. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003. PMID: 12820914 Chinese.
-
[Continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among nosocomial gram-negative bacilli from intensive care units in China].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Mar 10;83(5):375-81. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003. PMID: 12820912 Chinese.
-
[Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacilli isolated from 13 teaching hospitals across China].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 May 14;93(18):1388-96. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24025503 Chinese.
-
beta-Lactamase inhibition and in vitro activity of sulbactam and sulbactam/cefoperazone.Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):494-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.494. Clin Infect Dis. 1997. PMID: 9114205 Review.
-
Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Mar;88:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104707. Epub 2021 Jan 5. Infect Genet Evol. 2021. PMID: 33418147 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against Gram negative pathogens in blood stream infections using automated systems.Iran J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;16(6):732-736. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v16i6.17245. Iran J Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39737359 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous