Rasch modeling to assess Albanian and South African learners' preferences for real-life situations to be used in mathematics: a pilot study
- PMID: 23442330
Rasch modeling to assess Albanian and South African learners' preferences for real-life situations to be used in mathematics: a pilot study
Abstract
This paper reports on an investigation on the real-life situations students in grades 8 and 9 in South Africa and Albania prefer to use in Mathematics. The functioning of the instrument used to assess the order of preference learners from both countries have for contextual situations is assessed using Rasch modeling techniques. For both the cohorts, the data fit the Rasch model. The differential item functioning (DIF) analysis rendered 3 items operating differentially for the two cohorts. Explanations for these differences are provided in terms of differences in experiences learners in the two countries have related to some of the contextual situations. Implications for interpretation of international comparative tests are offered, as are the possibilities for the cross-country development of curriculum materials related to contexts that learners prefer to use in Mathematics.
Similar articles
-
Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.J Appl Meas. 2013;14(1):44-56. J Appl Meas. 2013. PMID: 23442327
-
With hiccups and bumps: the development of a Rasch-based instrument to measure elementary students' understanding of the nature of science.J Appl Meas. 2013;14(1):57-78. J Appl Meas. 2013. PMID: 23442328
-
A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model.J Appl Meas. 2013;14(1):1-9. J Appl Meas. 2013. PMID: 23442324
-
Overview of quantitative measurement methods. Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications.Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S39-49. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245452.48613.45. Med Care. 2006. PMID: 17060834 Review.
-
A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):137-158. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12078. Epub 2016 Dec 13. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017. PMID: 27958642 Review.