Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;30(4):563-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-9932-1. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers

Ryan J Heitmann  1 , Micah J Hill, Kevin S Richter, Alan H DeCherney, Eric A Widra
Affiliations

The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers

Ryan J Heitmann et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Prior studies have validated the ability of the SART embryo scoring system to correlate with outcomes in cleavage stage embryo transfers. However, this scoring system has not been evaluated in blastocyst transfers. The objective of this study was to estimate the correlation between the simplified SART embryo scoring system and ART cycle outcomes in single blastocyst transfers.

Materials and methods: All fresh, autologous single blastocyst transfers cycles from a large ART center from 2010 were analyzed. Blastocysts were given a single grade of good, fair, or poor based upon SART criteria which combines the grading of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm. Multiple logistic regression assessed the predictive value of the SART grade on embryo implantation and live birth.

Results: Seven hundred seventeen fresh, autologous single blastocyst transfers cycles were included in the analysis. The live birth rate was 52 % and included both elective and non-elective SBT. Chi square analysis showed higher live birth in good grade embryos as compared to fair (p=0.03) and poor (p=0.02). Univariate binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated SART embryo grading to be significantly correlated with both implantation and live birth (p<0.01). This significance persisted when patient age, BMI, and the stage of the blastocyst were controlled for with multiple logistic regression. In five patients with a poor blastocyst score, there were no live births.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that the SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers. Patients with a good grade embryo are excellent candidates for a single blastocyst transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Implantation and live births among the SART grading categories. Chi Square analysis performed on live birth between the different grading categories. p value <0.05 considered significant. *Good vs. Fair. p = 0.03. ^Good vs. Poor. p = 0.02
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Live birth stratified by SART blastocyst grade (good, fair, and poor) and SART age groups (<35, 35–57, and 38–40). No patients in the study were in the SART age group 41–42
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boiso I, Veiga A, Edwards RG. Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(3):328–50. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61841-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Chason RJ, et al. Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):580–84. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feinberg EC, Larsen FW, Catherino WH, et al. Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:888–894. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujimoto VY, Luke B, Brown MB, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:382–390. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In-vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond. Carnforth: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. pp. 378–88.

LinkOut - more resources