Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun;30(6):e201-7.
doi: 10.1111/dme.12168. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Waist-to-height ratio is the best indicator for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Waist-to-height ratio is the best indicator for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes

Z Xu et al. Diabet Med. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Aims: Early detection of diabetes is important for the prevention of diabetic complications. The best adiposity index for indicating Type 2 diabetes mellitus remains unclear. We aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure among BMI, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio to indicate undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese adults.

Methods: A total of 7567 participants aged 20-79 years were included in this study. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l in participants without diabetes. Undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes was identified as fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l when neither a history of diabetes nor use of hypoglycaemic drugs was present. Body weight, height, waist and hip circumferences were measured following standard procedures. Data were analysed using logistic regression and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: Of the 7567 participants, 536 were defined as having impaired fasting glucose and 690 were patients with Type 2 diabetes, including 290 (3.8%) persons with undiagnosed diabetes. In multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratios of waist-to-height ratio (≥ 0.5) were stronger than BMI (≥ 24 kg/m²), waist circumference (≥ 85 cm in men and ≥ 80 cm in women) and waist-hip ratio (≥ 0.85) for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose. Among the four indices, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 showed the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes (0.725, 95% CI 0.693-0.756) and impaired fasting glucose (0.662, 95% CI 0.638-0.687).

Conclusions: By comparison with BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio ≥ 0.5 may be the best indicator for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources