Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Feb 28:13:34.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-34.

Perceptions of UK medical graduates' preparedness for practice: a multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Perceptions of UK medical graduates' preparedness for practice: a multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job

Jan C Illing et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that graduates of different medical schools vary in their preparedness for their first post. In 2003 Goldacre et al. reported that over 40% of UK medical graduates did not feel prepared and found large differences between graduates of different schools. A follow-up survey showed that levels of preparedness had increased yet there was still wide variation. This study aimed to examine whether medical graduates from three diverse UK medical schools were prepared for practice.

Methods: This was a qualitative study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Prospective and cross-sectional data were collected from the three medical schools.A sample of 60 medical graduates (20 from each school) was targeted. They were interviewed three times: at the end of medical school (n = 65) and after four (n = 55) and 12 months (n = 46) as a Year 1 Foundation Programme doctor. Triangulated data were collected from clinicians via interviews across the three sites (n = 92). In addition three focus groups were conducted with senior clinicians who assess learning portfolios. The focus was on identifying areas of preparedness for practice and any areas of lack of preparedness.

Results: Although selected for being diverse, we did not find substantial differences between the schools. The same themes were identified at each site. Junior doctors felt prepared in terms of communication skills, clinical and practical skills and team working. They felt less prepared for areas of practice that are based on experiential learning in clinical practice: ward work, being on call, management of acute clinical situations, prescribing, clinical prioritisation and time management and dealing with paperwork.

Conclusions: Our data highlighted the importance of students learning on the job, having a role in the team in supervised practice to enable them to learn about the duties and responsibilities of a new doctor in advance of starting work.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s Doctors. London: GMC; 2003.
    1. Goldacre M, Lambert I, Evans J, Turner G. PRHOs’ views on whether their experience at medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2003;326:1011–1101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cave J, Goldacre M, Lambert T, Woolf K, Jones A. Newly qualified doctors’ views about whether their medical school had trained them well. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-50. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langdale LA, Schaad D, Wipf J, Marshall S, Vontver L, Scott CS. Preparing graduates for the first year of residency: are medical schools meeting the need? Acad Med. 2003;78:39–44. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200301000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong EG, Mackey M, Spear SJ. Medical Education as a process management problem. Acad Med. 2004;79(8):721–728. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200408000-00002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources