Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Sep;29(9):747-54.
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827a784e.

Combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and milnacipran for fibromyalgia: a feasibility randomized-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Combining cognitive-behavioral therapy and milnacipran for fibromyalgia: a feasibility randomized-controlled trial

Dennis C Ang et al. Clin J Pain. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized-controlled trial and to obtain estimates of the effects of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment arms: (1) combination therapy (n = 20); (2) milnacipran+education (n = 19); and (3) placebo+CBT (n = 19). Patients received either milnacipran (100 mg/d) or placebo. Patients also received 8 sessions of phone-delivered CBT or educational instructions, but only from baseline to week 9. Assessments were conducted at baseline, week 9, and 21. The primary endpoints were baseline to week 21 changes in weekly average pain intensity and physical function (SF-36 physical function scale).

Results: Compared with milnacipran, combination therapy demonstrated a moderate effect on improving SF-36 physical function (SE = 9.42 [5.48], P = 0.09, effect size = 0.60) and in reducing weekly average pain intensity (mean difference [SE] = -1.18 [0.62], P = 0.07, effect size = 0.67). Compared with milnacipran, CBT had a moderate to large effect in improving SF-36 physical function (mean difference [SE] = 11.0 [5.66], P = 0.06, effect size = 0.70). Despite the presence of concomitant centrally acting therapies, dropout rate was lower than anticipated (15% at week 21). Importantly, at least 6 out of the 8 phone-based therapy sessions were successfully completed by 89% of the patients; and adherence to the treatment protocols was > 95%.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, a therapeutic approach that combines phone-based CBT and milnacipran was feasible and acceptable. Moreover, the preliminary data supports conducting a fully powered randomized-controlled trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01038323.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest to declare

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of Participants in the Trial

References

    1. Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell IJ, Hebert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(1):19–28. - PubMed
    1. Hauser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, Sommer C. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with antidepressants: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(2):198–209. - PubMed
    1. Hauser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, Sommer C. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2009;145(1–2):69–81. - PubMed
    1. Hassett AL, Williams DA. Non-pharmacological treatment of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011;25(2):299–309. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(2):160–172. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data