Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 May;20(5):657-9.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.00719-12. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

Evaluation of a rapid device for serological diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs as an alternative to immunofluorescence assay and Western blotting

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of a rapid device for serological diagnosis of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs as an alternative to immunofluorescence assay and Western blotting

E Ferroglio et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 May.

Abstract

In this study, we compared a rapid immunochromatographic test (Speed Leish K; BVT Groupe Virbac, La Seyne sur Mer, France) with an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFAT) and Western blotting (WB) for the detection of Leishmania infantum antibodies in dogs. A total of 250 serum samples were collected from 125 L. infantum-positive and 125 L. infantum-negative dogs. Among the positive samples, 81 were strongly positive at low IFAT dilutions, while 44 were low-reactivity sera (IFAT titers, 1:40 to 1:80). The sensitivity and specificity of the Speed Leish K were 96.3% and 100%, respectively, compared with those of the IFAT. When IFAT low-reactivity sera (titers, 1:40 or 1:80) were tested with the Speed Leish K, using WB results as a reference, the sensitivities were 93.75% for sera with a 1:80 titer and 73.33% for sera with a 1:40 titer, and the specificity was 100%. The Speed Leish K is easy to use and performs well, so it can be considered a quick and reliable tool for the diagnosis of L. infantum infection in dogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ozbel Y, Turgay N, Ozensoy S, Ozbilgin A, Alkan MZ, Ozcel MA, Jaffe CL, Schnur L, Oskam L, Abranches P. 1995. Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean region. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 89(Suppl 1): 89–93 - PubMed
    1. Gradoni L. 1999. Epizootiology of canine leishmaniasis in southern Europe, p 32–39 In Killick-Kendrick R. (ed), Canine leishmaniasis: an update. Proceedings of the Canine Leishmaniasis Forum, Barcelona, Spain. Hoechst Roussel Vet, Wiesbaden, Germany.
    1. Ferroglio E, Maroli M, Gastaldo S, Mignone W, Rossi L. 2005. Canine leishmaniasis in Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11: 1618–1620 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maroli M, Rossi L, Baldelli R, Capelli G, Ferroglio E, Genchi C, Gramiccia M, Mortarino M, Pietrobelli M, Gradoni L. 2008. The northward spread of leishmaniasis in Italy: evidence from retrospective and ongoing studies on the canine reservoir and phlebotomine vectors. Trop. Med. Int. Health 13: 256–264 - PubMed
    1. Naucke TJ, Menn B, Massberg D, Lorentz S. 2008. Sandflies and leishmaniasis in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 103: S65–S68 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances