Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;8(12):1943-54.
doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.200. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

Tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles: a nanomedicine approach to treat drug-resistant breast cancer

Affiliations

Tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles: a nanomedicine approach to treat drug-resistant breast cancer

Dhruba J Bharali et al. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013 Dec.

Retraction in

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to evaluate tetraiodothyroacetic acid (tetrac), a thyroid hormone analog of L-thyroxin, conjugated to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (T-PLGA-NPs) both in vitro and in vivo for the treatment of drug-resistant breast cancer.

Materials & methods: The uptake of tetrac and T-PLGA-NPs in doxorubicin-resistant MCF7 (MCF7-Dx) cells was evaluated using confocal microscopy. Cell proliferation assays and a chick chorioallantoic membrane model of FGF2-induced angiogenesis were used to evaluate the anticancer effects of T-PLGA-NPs. In vivo efficacy was examined in a MCF7-Dx orthotopic tumor BALBc nude mouse model.

Results: T-PLGA-NPs were restricted from entering into the cell nucleus, and T-PLGA-NPs inhibited angiogenesis by 100% compared with 60% by free tetrac. T-PLGA-NPs enhanced inhibition of tumor-cell proliferation at a low-dose equivalent of free tetrac. In vivo treatment with either tetrac or T-PLGA-NPs resulted in a three- to five-fold inhibition of tumor weight.

Conclusion: T-PLGA-NPs have high potential as anticancer agents, with possible applications in the treatment of drug-resistant cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Measurement of nanoparticle size and zeta-potential by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy
(A) A representative histogram from dynamic light scattering data of the size (diameter) distribution of tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles. The average size of the tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles was approximately 200 nm; (AI) size distribution by intensity; and (AII) intensity statistics. (B) Transmission electron microscopy image showing the morphology of tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Confocal microscopy images showing the uptake of Cy3-tetraiodothyroacetic acid and Cy3-tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles by doxorubicin-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cells
Magnifcation: 63×; Optical zoom: 5×. Cells were counter-stained with DAPI to visualize the nuclei: blue for DAPI and red for Cy3-tetrac or Cy3-T-PLGA–NPs. DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole fluorescent stain; tetrac: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid; T-PLGA-NPs: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid conjugated to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The effects of tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles on FGF2-induced angiogenesis measured by the chick chorioallantoic membrane assay
(A) Photomicrographs of representative chick chorioallantoic membranes treated with free tetrac or T-PLGA-NPs. Chick chorioallantoic membranes were also treated with FGF2 or PBS as a positive and a negative control, respectively. (B) Quantification of angiogenesis inhibition by tetrac versus T-PLGA-NPs. Data represent the number of branch points and were normalized to the negative control (PBS). Data are expressed as percentage inhibition of angiogenesis induced by FGF2 alone (mean ± standard error of the mean). *p ≤ 0.01. PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline; tetrac: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid; T-PLGA-NPs: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid conjugated to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Cell proliferation assays of tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles showing the inhibition of cell proliferation
(A) MCF7 breast cancer cells. (B) Doxorubicin-resistant MCF7 (MCF7-Dx) breast cancer cells. (C) MCF7 breast cancer cells, incubated with 1 µM T4(D) MCF7-Dx breast cancer cells, incubated with 1 µM T4. A low dose (1 µM) of free tetrac has no effect on cell proliferation in either MCF7 or MCF7-Dx cells, whereas even a low-dose equivalent of tetrac conjugated to nanoparticles can inhibit cell proliferation by 60%. A high dose (10 µM) of free tetrac has a similar effect on inhibition to that of a high dose of tetrac conjugated to nanoparticles. T4: l-thyroxin; tetrac: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid; T-PLGA-NPs: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles; Void nano: Nanoparticles only, without any tetrac.
Figure 5
Figure 5. In vivo suppression by tetraiodothyroacetic acid versus tetraiodothyroacetic acid-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles in drug-resistant breast cancer orthotopic tumor mouse model
Treatment with tetrac and T-PLGA-NPs (1 mg/kg bodyweight) was started on day 8, after orthotopically implanting doxorubicin-resistant MCF7 cells in female BALBc nude mice, and continued daily. (A) Effect of tetrac and T-PLGA-NP treatment on doxorubicin-resistant MCF7 tumor volume over time, up to 16 days. Data represent mean tumor volume (mm3) ± standard deviation; n = 8 per group. (B) Effect on tumor weight at day 16 after the treatments (end of study). tetrac: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid; T-PLGA-NPs: Tetraiodothyroacetic acid conjugated to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles.

Comment in

  • Findings of Research Misconduct.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Fed Regist. 2024 Jun 4;89(108):47968-47969. Fed Regist. 2024. PMID: 38854442 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Bharali DJ, Mousa SA. Emerging nanomedicines for early cancer detection, improved treatment: current perspective future promise. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010;128(2):324–335. - PubMed
    1. Brannon-Peppas L, Blanchette JO. Nanoparticle targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004;56(11):1649–1659. - PubMed
    1. Nagahara LA, Lee JS, Molnar LK, et al. Strategic workshops on cancer nanotechnology. Cancer Res. 2010;70(11):4265–4268. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain RK, Stylianopoulos T. Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2010;7(11):653–664. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim K, Kim JH, Park H, et al. Tumor-homing multifunctional nanoparticles for cancer theragnosis: simultaneous diagnosis drug delivery therapeutic monitoring. J. Control. Release. 2010;146(2):219–227. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms