Prognostic and predictive value of VEGF, sVEGFR-2 and CEA in mCRC studies comparing cediranib, bevacizumab and chemotherapy
- PMID: 23449351
- PMCID: PMC3619270
- DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.79
Prognostic and predictive value of VEGF, sVEGFR-2 and CEA in mCRC studies comparing cediranib, bevacizumab and chemotherapy
Abstract
Background: The prognostic/predictive value of potential vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling biomarkers was evaluated retrospectively using samples from two randomized Phase III studies (HORIZON II and III) investigating cediranib in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods: Baseline levels of VEGF, soluble VEGF receptor-2 (sVEGFR-2) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured in plasma/serum samples collected from patients participating in HORIZON II (n=860; FOLFOX/XELOX plus cediranib 20 mg (n=502) or placebo (n=358)) and HORIZON III (n=1422; mFOLFOX6 plus cediranib 20 mg (n=709) or bevacizumab (n=713)). Median biomarker baseline levels determined cutoff values for the patient subgroups.
Results: Baseline data were available for 88-97% of patients/study (>2000 patients). In both the studies, high baseline VEGF and CEA were associated with worse outcomes for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) independent of treatment (HORIZON II OS: VEGF, hazard ratio (HR)=1.35 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.63); CEA, HR=1.63 (1.36-1.96); HORIZON III OS: VEGF, HR=1.32 (1.12-1.54); CEA, HR=1.50 (1.29-1.76)). sVEGFR-2 was not prognostic for PFS/OS. Baseline VEGF and CEA were not predictive for PFS/OS outcome to cediranib treatment; low sVEGFR-2 was associated with a trend towards improved cediranib effect in HORIZON II.
Conclusion: Baseline VEGF and CEA levels were treatment-independent prognostic biomarkers for PFS and OS in both the studies.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Cediranib with mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomized phase III study (HORIZON III).J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3588-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5355. Epub 2012 Sep 10. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22965961 Clinical Trial.
-
Cediranib plus FOLFOX/CAPOX versus placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study (HORIZON II).J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3596-603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6031. Epub 2012 Sep 10. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22965965 Clinical Trial.
-
KRAS mutations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but are not predictive for benefit with cediranib.Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Eur J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23510802
-
High VEGF-A level at baseline predicts poor treatment effect of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Panminerva Med. 2016 Mar;58(1):48-58. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Panminerva Med. 2016. PMID: 26763741 Review.
-
Biomarkers of anti-angiogenic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): original data and review of the literature.Z Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct;49(10):1398-406. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281752. Epub 2011 Sep 30. Z Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21964893 Review.
Cited by
-
Are All Anti-Angiogenic Drugs the Same in the Treatment of Second-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer? Expert Opinion on Clinical Practice.Front Oncol. 2021 May 10;11:637823. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637823. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34041019 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antiangiogenic therapy for refractory colorectal cancer: current options and future strategies.Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017 Feb;9(2):106-126. doi: 10.1177/1758834016676703. Epub 2016 Nov 10. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28203302 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prediction of Response to Anti-Angiogenic Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients: From Biological Factors to Functional Imaging.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;16(7):1364. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071364. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38611042 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Landscape to Targeted Therapy.J Oncol. 2021 Jul 6;2021:9918116. doi: 10.1155/2021/9918116. eCollection 2021. J Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34326875 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Total and not bevacizumab-bound vascular endothelial growth factor as potential predictive factors to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 21;22(27):6287-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6287. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27468218 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amaya H, Tanigawa N, Lu C, Matsumura M, Shimomatsuya T, Horiuchi T, Muraoka R. Association of vascular endothelial growth factor expression with tumor angiogenesis, survival and thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor expression in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 1997;119:227–235. - PubMed
-
- Andicoechea A, Vizoso F, Alexandre E, Cuesta E, Cruz DM, Miera L, Garcia-Muniz JL, Martinez E, Ruibal A. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 195 (CA195) and CEA serum levels as prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 1998;13:158–164. - PubMed
-
- de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang C-H, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, De Marinis F, Abratt RP, Wolf J, Blackhall FH, Langmuir P, Milenkova T, Read J, Vansteenkiste JF. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind Phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1067–1074. - PubMed
-
- De Vita F, Orditura M, Lieto E, Infusino S, Morgillo F, Martinelli E, Castellano P, Romano C, Ciardiello F, Catalano G, Pignatelli C, Galizia G. Elevated perioperative serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with colon carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:270–278. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical