Predictive factors for longer length of stay in an emergency department: a prospective multicentre study evaluating the impact of age, patient's clinical acuity and complexity, and care pathways
- PMID: 23449890
- DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202155
Predictive factors for longer length of stay in an emergency department: a prospective multicentre study evaluating the impact of age, patient's clinical acuity and complexity, and care pathways
Abstract
Background: It has been reported that emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS) for older patients is longer than average. Our objective was to determine the effect of age, patient's clinical acuity and complexity, and care pathways on ED-LOS and ED plus observation unit (EDOU) LOS (EDOU-LOS).
Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, observational study including all patients attending in 2011. Age groups were: I, <50; II, ≥50-64; III, ≥65-74; IV, ≥75-84; V, ≥85 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
Results: Of 125 478 attendances, 20 845(16.6%) were of patients aged ≥65 years. Multivariate analysis found significant predictors for ED-LOS (C-statistics 0.79, p<0.0000001) to be: arrival mode (ambulance, OR 1.13 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.18)); acuity level (level 4, OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.28); level 1-3, OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.5 to 1.59)); haematological examinations (OR 3.34 (95% CI 3.15 to 3.56)); intravenous treatment (OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.47 to 1.69)); monitoring of vital signs (OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.69 to 2.10)); x-ray examinations (OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.45 to 1.61)); CT/MRI/ultrasound (OR 2.60 (95% CI 2.39 to 2.82)); and specialist advice (OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.48)). For EDOU-LOS (C-statistics 0.81, p<0.0000001) we found: age group (II, OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.22); III, OR 1.42 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.46); IV, OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.65 to 1.74); V, 2.01 (95% CI 1.96 to 2.07)); acuity level (level 4, OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.35); level 1-3, OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.66 to 1.77)); haematological examinations (OR 7.81 (95% CI 7.23 to 8.43)); intravenous treatment (OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.12)); x-ray examinations (OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.85 to 2.06)); CT/MRI/ultrasound (OR 6.74 (95% CI 5.98 to 7.6)); specialist advice (OR 2.24 (95% CI 2.07 to 2.42)); admission to a medical or surgical ward (OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.68)); and transfer (OR 1.79 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.07)).
Conclusions: Whereas ED-LOS and EDOU-LOS seem to be directly related to patients' acuity and complexity, notably the need for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, only EDOU-LOS was significantly associated with age and proposed care pathways. We propose that EDOU-LOS measurement should be made in EDs with an OU.
Keywords: Clinical Care; Clinical Management; Emergency Department Management.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
Effect of testing and treatment on emergency department length of stay using a national database.Acad Emerg Med. 2012 May;19(5):525-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01353.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22594356
-
Predictive variables of an emergency department quality and performance indicator: a 1-year prospective, observational, cohort study evaluating hospital and emergency census variables and emergency department time interval measurements.Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):638-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201404. Epub 2012 Aug 20. Emerg Med J. 2013. PMID: 22906702
-
Prospective evaluation of a simplified risk stratification tool for patients with chest pain in an emergency department observation unit.Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep;12(3):132-6. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31829a79cd. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23892943
-
Comparison of methods for measuring crowding and its effects on length of stay in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1269-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01232.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 22168190 Review.
-
An Updated Scoping Review of Factors Associated with Length of Stay in Emergency Department.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 4;18:3191-3203. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S525451. eCollection 2025. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025. PMID: 40491543 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Priorities of End Users of Emergency Department Electronic Health Records: Modified Delphi Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Mar 10;10:e43103. doi: 10.2196/43103. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 36897633 Free PMC article.
-
Causes of Prolonged Emergency Department Stay; a Cross-sectional Action Research.Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):e18. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.58. eCollection 2018 Spring. Adv J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 31172081 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors for Delayed Emergency Department Care in Medical Patients with Acute Infections - An International Prospective Observational Study.PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155363. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27171476 Free PMC article.
-
Models to predict length of stay in the emergency department: a systematic literature review and appraisal.BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00965-4. BMC Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38575857 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Length of Stay among Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department-Using an Accelerated Failure Time Model.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0165756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165756. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28107348 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources