Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;6(1):75-80.
doi: 10.1007/s11832-011-0379-6. Epub 2012 Jan 7.

Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing or plate and screw fixation of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review

Daniel J Westacott  1 , Robert W Jordan, Stephen J Cooke
Affiliations

Functional outcome following intramedullary nailing or plate and screw fixation of paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review

Daniel J Westacott et al. J Child Orthop. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Unstable paediatric diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures requiring fixation have traditionally been treated with rigid internal fixation with plate and screws. Intramedullary stabilisation has grown in popularity over the last 25 years but may be associated with rotational deformity and subsequent loss of pronosupination. This systematic review aims to establish which treatment method provides better functional outcome.

Methods: A systematic review of the published literature was performed, searching Medline, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies comparing intramedullary nailing with plate and screws in patients less than 18 years old with both-bone diaphyseal forearm fractures.

Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. They were all retrospective comparative studies (level III or IV). One was age- and sex-matched. Three looked specifically at older children. No study reported a significant difference in functional outcome with either treatment.

Conclusions: The currently available literature shows no difference in functional outcome between intramedullary nailing and plate and screw fixation, even in older children with less remodelling potential. Intramedullary nailing may therefore be the treatment of choice for simple fracture patterns due to shorter operative time, better cosmesis and ease of removal. Plating may still have a role in more complex injuries.

Keywords: Child; Fracture fixation; Radius fracture; Treatment outcome; Ulna fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart demonstrating the process of article selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cheng JC, Shen WY. Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3,350 children. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(1):15–22. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199302000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6(6):656–660. doi: 10.1097/01241398-198611000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Landin LA. Epidemiology of children’s fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6(2):79–83. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199704000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Lam PK. A 10-year study of the changes in the pattern and treatment of 6,493 fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(3):344–350. - PubMed
    1. Creasman C, Zaleske DJ, Ehrlich MG. Analyzing forearm fractures in children. The more subtle signs of impending problems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;188:40–53. - PubMed