Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 1;64(3):284-8.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.003782011.

Public stigma associated with psychosis risk syndrome in a college population: implications for peer intervention

Affiliations

Public stigma associated with psychosis risk syndrome in a college population: implications for peer intervention

Lawrence H Yang et al. Psychiatr Serv. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared stigma associated with the psychosis risk label and diagnostic labels for nonpsychotic and psychotic mental disorders among young adult peers.

Methods: Urban college respondents (N=153) read an experimental vignette describing a young adult experiencing prodromal symptoms who was randomly assigned a diagnostic label (major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, or psychosis risk with and without accurate information about the psychosis risk label) and answered questions about stigma toward the individual in the vignette.

Results: Compared with labels for nonpsychotic disorders, schizophrenia elicited more negative stereotyping and the at-risk label invoked greater social distance and less willingness to help. Any increased social distance appeared to be reduced by accurate information about the at-risk state. No differences in stigma were found for the psychosis risk and schizophrenia labels.

Conclusions: The psychosis risk label alone appeared to evoke greater status loss and discrimination. Accurate information may minimize some stigmatizing attitudes among college peers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors report no competing interests.

References

    1. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2008;65:28–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corcoran C, Malaspina D, Hercher L. Prodromal interventions for schizophrenia vulnerability: the risks of being “at risk. Schizophrenia Research. 2005;73:173–184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moses T. Self-labeling and its effects among adolescents diagnosed with mental disorders. Social Science and Medicine. 2009;68:570–578. - PubMed
    1. Yang LH, Wonpat-Borja AJ, Opler MG, et al. Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: an empirical question. Schizophrenia Research. 2010;120:42–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzoni P, Kimhy D, Khan S, et al. Childhood onset diagnoses in a case series of teens at clinical high risk for psychosis. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psycho-pharmacology. 2009;19:771–776. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources