Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation
- PMID: 23450526
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub2
Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation
Update in
-
Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26334436 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive babies.
Objectives: To assess the effects of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin on the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation when given to Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2012).
Selection criteria: Randomised trials in Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment, placebo or a different regimen of anti-D.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data.
Main results: Two trials with moderate to high risk of bias, involving over 4500 women, compared anti-D prophylaxis with no anti-D during pregnancy. When women received anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation, risks of immunisation were not significantly different than for women not given antenatal anti-D: risk ratio (RR) of immunisation during pregnancy was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.17); after the birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.42 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.17); and within 12 months after birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.62).However, women receiving anti-D during pregnancy were significantly less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test (which detects fetal cells in maternal blood) in pregnancy (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88) and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.79). No data were available for the risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. No significant differences were seen for neonatal jaundice, and no adverse effects were reported in either trial.
Authors' conclusions: The risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during or immediately after a first pregnancy is about 1%. Administration of 100 µg (500 IU) anti-D to women in their first pregnancy can reduce this risk to about 0.2% without, to date, any adverse effects. Although unlikely to confer benefit in the current pregnancy, fewer women may have Rhesus D antibodies in any subsequent pregnancy, but the effects of this needs to be tested in studies of robust design.
Update of
-
Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing rhesus alloimmunisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub2. PMID: 10796088 Updated.
Similar articles
-
Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26334436 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing rhesus alloimmunisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD000020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000020.pub2. PMID: 10796088 Updated.
-
Anti-D administration after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD009617. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009617.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23543581 Free PMC article.
-
Intramuscular versus intravenous anti-D for preventing Rhesus alloimmunization during pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD007885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007885.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23440818 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 14;(1):CD008873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 26;7:CD008873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub4. PMID: 26765344 Updated.
Cited by
-
A Phase 1b PK/PD Study to Demonstrate Antigen Elimination with RLYB212, A Monoclonal Anti-HPA-1a Antibody for FNAIT Prevention.Thromb Haemost. 2025 Apr;125(4):352-363. doi: 10.1055/a-2398-9344. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Thromb Haemost. 2025. PMID: 39168139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.Blood Transfus. 2015 Jan;13(1):109-34. doi: 10.2450/2014.0119-14. Blood Transfus. 2015. PMID: 25633877 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 10;14:411. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0411-1. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25491600 Free PMC article.
-
Financial implications of RHD genotyping of pregnant women with a serologic weak D phenotype.Transfusion. 2015 Sep;55(9):2095-103. doi: 10.1111/trf.13074. Epub 2015 Mar 21. Transfusion. 2015. PMID: 25808011 Free PMC article.
-
Following targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis, almost half of the pregnant women had undetectable anti-D prophylaxis at delivery.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Apr;101(4):431-440. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14328. Epub 2022 Feb 27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 35224728 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical