Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD006041.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006041.pub3.

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Preoperative chemoradiation versus radiation alone for stage II and III resectable rectal cancer

Laura De Caluwé et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) decreases local recurrence rate and improves survival in stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The combination of chemotherapy with RT has a sound radiobiological rationale, and phase II trials of combined chemoradiation (CRT) have shown promising activity in rectal cancer.

Objectives: To compare preoperative RT with preoperative CRT in patients with resectable stage II and III rectal cancer.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase.com, and Pubmed from 1975 until June 2012. A manual search was performed of Ann Surg, Arch Surg, Cancer, J Clin Oncol, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and the proceedings of ASTRO, ECCO and ASCO from 1990 until June 2012.

Selection criteria: Relevant studies randomized resectable stage II or III rectal cancer patients to at least one arm of preoperative RT alone or at least one arm of preoperative CRT.

Data collection and analysis: Primary outcome parameters included overall survival (OS) at 5 years and local recurrence (LR) rate at 5 years. Secondary outcome parameters included disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years, metastasis rate, pathological complete response rate, clinical response rate, sphincter preservation rate, acute toxicity, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and anastomotic leak rate. Outcome parameters were summarized using the Odds Ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed effects model.

Main results: Five trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. From one of the included trials only preliminary data are reported. The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative RT significantly increased grade III and IV acute toxicity (OR 1.68-10, P = 0.002) and marginally affected postoperative overall morbidity (OR 0.67-1.00, P = 0.05) while no differences were observed in postoperative mortality or anastomotic leak rate. Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT significantly increased the rate of complete pathological response (OR 2.12-5.84, P < 0.00001) although this did not translate into a higher sphincter preservation rate (OR 0.92-1.30, P = 0.32). The incidence of local recurrence at five years was significantly lower in the CRT group compared to RT alone (OR 0.39-0.72, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in DFS (OR 0.92-1.34, P = 0.27) or OS (OR 0.79-1.14, P = 0.58) at five years.

Authors' conclusions: Compared to preoperative RT alone, preoperative CRT enhances pathological response and improves local control in resectable stage II and III rectal cancer, but does not benefit disease free or overall survival. The effects of preoperative CRT on functional outcome and quality of life are incompletely understood and should be addressed in future trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

1
1
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.10 Local Recurrence at 5y.
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.12 HR_LR.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.1 Overall Survival at 5y.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.2 HR_OS.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.3 Disease free survival at 5 y.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.11 HR_DFS.
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.6 Grade III ‐ IV toxicity.
8
8
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.7 Sphincter preservation.
9
9
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.4 Mortality 30 d.
10
10
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.5 Postop morbidity.
11
11
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.9 Anastomotic leak.
12
12
Forest plot of comparison: 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, outcome: 1.8 pCR.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 1 Overall Survival at 5y.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 2 HR_OS.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 3 Disease free survival at 5 y.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 4 Mortality 30 d.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 5 Postop morbidity.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 6 Grade III ‐ IV toxicity.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 7 Sphincter preservation.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 8 pCR.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 9 Anastomotic leak.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 10 Local Recurrence at 5y.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 11 HR_DFS.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 radiotherapy vs radiochemotherapy, Outcome 12 HR_LR.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Bosset 2006 {published data only}
    1. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic‐Jelic L, et al.EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355:1114‐23. - PubMed
Boulis‐Wassif 1984 {published data only}
    1. Boulis‐Wassif S, Gerard A, Loygue J, Camelot D, Buyse M, Duez N. Final Results of a Randomized Trial on the Treatment of Rectal Cancer with Preoperative Radiotherapy Alone or in Combination With 5‐Fluorouracil, Followed by radical surgery. Cancer 1984;53:1811‐1818. - PubMed
Bujko 2006 {published data only}
    1. Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska‐Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Long‐term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short‐course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2006;93:1215‐1223. - PubMed
Gerard 2006 {published data only}
    1. Gérard J‐P, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon‐Dejardin M‐T, et al. Preoperative Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in T3‐T4 Rectal Cancers: Results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4620‐4625. - PubMed
Latkauskas 2011 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Latkauskas T, Pauzas H, Gineikiene I, Janciauskiene R, Juozaityte E, Saladzinskas Z, et al. Initial results of a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and pathological downstaging of rectal cancer after preoperative short‐course radiotherapy or long‐term chemoradiotherapy, both with delayed surgery. Colorectal Dis 2011;14(3):294‐298. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Siegel 2009 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Siegel R, Burock S, Wernecke KD, Kretzschmar A, Dietel M, Loy V, et al. Preoperative short‐course radiotherapy versus combined radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi‐centre prospectively randomised study of the Berlin Cancer Society. BMC Cancer 2009;9:50. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Ammann 2003
    1. Ammann K, Kirchmayr W, Klaus A, Muhlmann G, Kafka R, Oberwalder M, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on anal sphincter function in patients with carcinoma of the midrectum and low rectum. Archives of Surgery 2003;138(3):257‐261. - PubMed
Beets‐Tan 2003
    1. Beets‐Tan RGH, Beets GL. Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2003;18(5):385‐391. - PubMed
Beets‐Tan 2005
    1. Beets‐Tan RGH, Lettinga T, Beets GL. Pre‐operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome. Ejso 2005;31(6):681‐688. - PubMed
Bosset 2000
    1. Bosset JF, Magnin V, Maingon P, Mantion G, Pelissier EP, Mercier M, et al. Preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer: Long‐term results of a phase II trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2000;46(2):323‐327. - PubMed
Bosset 2004
    1. Bosset JF, Calais G, Daban A, Berger C, Radosevic‐Jelic L, Maingon P, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients: assessment of acute toxicity and treatment compliance ‐ Report of the 22921 randomised trial conducted by the EORTC Radiotherapy Group. European Journal of Cancer 2004;40(2):219‐224. - PubMed
Brown 2004
    1. Brown G, Kirkham A, Williams GT, Bourne M, Radcliffe AG, Sayman J, et al. High‐resolution MRI of the anatomy important in total mesorectal excision of the rectum. American Journal of Roentgenology 2004;182(2):431‐439. [0361‐803X] - PubMed
Brown 2006
    1. Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Blomqvist L, Sebag‐Montefiore D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. British Medical Journal 2006;333(7572):779‐782. [0959‐8146] - PMC - PubMed
Bujko 2005
    1. Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Kepka L, Oledzki J, Bebenek M, Kryj M, Polish Colorectal Study Group. Postoperative complications in patients irradiated pre‐operatively for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short‐term radiotherapy vs chemoradiation. Colorectal Disease 2005;7(4):410‐416. [1462‐8910] - PubMed
Dahlberg 1998
    1. Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Graf W, Pahlman L. Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer ‐ Results from a randomized study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1998;41(5):543‐549. - PubMed
Dale 2005
    1. Dale R, Carabe‐Fernandez A. The radiobiology of conventional radiotherapy and its application to radionuclide therapy. CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS 2005;20(1):47‐51. - PubMed
Daniels 2005
    1. Daniels IR. High spatial resolution MRI predicts turnout spread in patients with rectal cancer ‐ Results from the MERCURY study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2005;48(3):688‐689.
Enker 1999
    1. Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM, Lanouette NM, Swallow C, Guillem J, et al. Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer ‐ 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Annals of Surgery 1999;230(4):544‐552. - PMC - PubMed
Feliu 2002
    1. Feliu J, Calvillo J, Escribano A, Castro J, Sanchez ME, Mata A, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy of rectal carcinoma with UFT‐leucovorin plus radiotherapy. Annals of Oncology 2002;13(5):730‐736. - PubMed
Glimelius 2002
    1. Glimelius B. Radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Br Med Bull 2002;64:141‐157. - PubMed
Gray 2001
    1. Gray R, Hills R, Stowe R, Clarke M, Peto R, Buyse M, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet 2001;358(9290):1291‐1304. - PubMed
Heald 1982
    1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The Mesorectum in Rectal‐Cancer Surgery ‐ the Clue to Pelvic Recurrence. British Journal of Surgery 1982;69(10):613‐616. [0007‐1323] - PubMed
Heald 1998
    1. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RDH, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer ‐ The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978‐1997. Archives of Surgery 1998;133(8):894‐898. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011].. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. 2011.
Holm 1996
    1. Holm T, Singnomklao T, Rutqvist LE, Cedermark B. Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal carcinoma ‐ Adverse effects during long term follow‐up of two randomized trials. Cancer 1996;78(5):968‐976. - PubMed
Kapiteijn 2001
    1. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;345(9):638‐646. - PubMed
Mercier 2005
    1. Mercier M, Pasquet P, Puyraveau M, Bosset J, Calais G, Mineur L, et al. Evaluation of the sphincter function and quality of life in French patients with rectal cancer who entered the EORTC 22921 study.. Eur J Cancer 2005;Supplements 3, No.2:171.
Minsky 1993
    1. Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Kemeny N, Enker WE, Kelsen DP, Schwartz G, et al. Preoperative Combined 5‐Fu, Low‐Dose Leucovorin, and Sequential Radiation‐Therapy for Unresectable Rectal‐Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 1993;25(5):821‐827. - PubMed
Minsky 1997
    1. Minsky BD, Cohen AM, Enker WE, Saltz L, Guillem JG, Paty PB, et al. Preoperative 5‐FU, low‐dose leucovorin, and radiation therapy for locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 1997;37(2):289‐295. - PubMed
Nagtegaal 2002
    1. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CAA, Kranenbarg EK, Velde CJH, Krieken J. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma ‐ Not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 2002;26(3):350‐357. - PubMed
Osti 2004
    1. Osti MF, Valeriani M, Masoni L, Tombolini V, Enrici RM. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum. Tumori 2004;90(3):303‐309. - PubMed
Peeters 2005
    1. Peeters K, Velde CJH, Leer JWH, Martijn H, Junggeburt JMC, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Late side effects of short‐course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients ‐ A dutch colorectal cancer group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005;23(25):6199‐6206. - PubMed
Peeters 2007
    1. Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. The TME trial after a median follow‐up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;246:693‐701. - PubMed
Quirke 1986
    1. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Durdey P, Williams NS. Local Recurrence of Rectal Adenocarcinoma Due to Inadequate Surgical Resection ‐ Histopathological Study of Lateral Tumor Spread and Surgical Excision. Lancet 1986;2(8514):996‐999. [0140‐6736] - PubMed
Quirke 2003
    1. Quirke P. Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncology 2003;4(11):695‐702. - PubMed
Rodel 2003
    1. Rodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Schmoll HJ, Sauer R. Phase I/II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation for rectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2003;21(16):3098‐3104. - PubMed
Sauer 2004
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(17):1731‐1740. - PubMed
van den Brink 2004
    1. Brink M, Stiggelbout AM, Hout WB, Kievit J, Kranenbarg EK, Marijnen CAM, et al. Clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004;22(19):3958‐3964. [0732‐183X] - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources