Comparing the immunogenicity of AS03-adjuvanted 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccine with clinical protection in priority risk groups in England
- PMID: 23451097
- PMCID: PMC3579930
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056844
Comparing the immunogenicity of AS03-adjuvanted 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccine with clinical protection in priority risk groups in England
Abstract
In England, during pandemic 2009 H1N1, vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity population studies in priority groups were rolled out in parallel to evaluate the pandemic vaccination programme. This provided a unique opportunity to compare immunogenicity and clinical protection in the same population and thus provide insights into the correlates of protection for the pandemic H1N1 2009 vaccine in risk groups. While clinical protection from AS03-adjuvanted pandemic 2009 H1N1 vaccine was high in those aged <25 years and pregnant women, effectiveness in older adults with chronic conditions has been found to be surprisingly poor. Here we present results from the immunogenicity study derived from the same population. Individuals from priority groups eligible for pandemic vaccination attending participating general practices were recruited. Pre and post-vaccination blood samples were collected and HI antibody testing to assess immune response to vaccination performed. The final cohort consisted of 610 individuals: 60 healthy children aged <5 years; 32 healthy pregnant women; 518 individuals from risk groups. Seroconversion rate in healthy children aged <5 years (87%, 95% CI: 75% to 94%) was higher than that of risk groups combined (65%, 95% CI: 61% to 69%) (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis of risk groups showed that the size of response in those who did seroconvert was lower in those who received the 2009/10 seasonal TIV (Fold effect: 0.52, 0.35 to 0.78). Predicted immunological boosting from higher pre-vaccine titres after 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccination only occurred in children (seroconversion rate = 92%) and not in individuals aged 10 to 39 from risk groups (seroconversion rate = 74%). The lack of clinical protection identified in the same population in older adults from risk groups could be attributed to these lower seroresponses. Current immunogenicity licensing criteria for pandemic influenza vaccine may not correlate with clinical protection in individuals with chronic disease or immunocompromised.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Van Kerkhove MD, Vandemaele KAH, Shinde V, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, Koukounari A, et al. (2011) Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes following 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Infection: A Global Pooled Analysis. PLoS Med 8(7): e1001053 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001053 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Baguelin M, Hoek AJ, Jit M, Flasche S, White PJ, Edmunds WJ Vaccination against pandemic influenza A/H1N1v in England: a real-time economic Evaluation Vaccine. 2010 Mar 11;28(12): 2370–84. Epub 2010 Jan 21.). - PubMed
-
- Beyer WE, Palache AM, Sprenger MJ, Hendriksen E, Tukker JJ, et al. (1996) "Effects of repeated annual influenza vaccination on vaccine sero-response in young and elderly adults." Vaccine. 14 (14) 1331–39. - PubMed
-
- Andrews NJ, Walker WT, Finn A, Heath PT, Collinson AC, et al. (2011) Predictors of immune response and reactogenicity to AS03B-adjuvanted split virion and non-adjuvanted whole virion H1N1 (2009) pandemic influenza vaccines. Vaccine. Oct 19 29(45): 7913–9. - PubMed
-
- Roman F, Vaman T, Kafeja F, Hanon E, Van Damme P (2010) AS03(A)-Adjuvanted influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine for adults up to 85 years of age. Clinical Infectious Diseases 51: 668–77). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical