Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jun;32(3):353-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of probiotics for the management of radiation induced bowel disease

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of probiotics for the management of radiation induced bowel disease

Adeel Hamad et al. Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background & aims: A meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of probiotics in prevention of radiation-induced bowel disease after pelvic radiotherapy has been performed. Previous attempts have arguably failed to provide a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and their outcomes.

Methods: We searched for studies indexed in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and on-line clinical trials registers. There was no language or time limit. Each study was evaluated for methodological quality and outcomes. We identified four outcomes on which to perform meta-analysis: incidence of diarrhoea, loperamide use, watery, and soft stools (Bristol Stool Chart). Odds ratio (OR) was used to compare efficacy, and the pooled OR was estimated using a random effects model; heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q and Higgins I(2) test. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2.

Results: Ten studies were included in our systematic review, of which six were subjected to meta-analysis to compare probiotics against placebo. Quality assessment showed an unclear risk due to incomplete outcome data and lack of performance of intention-to-treat analysis, while blinding and randomization issues were present in certain studies. Pooled results showed heterogeneity (Cochran's Q: p < 0.05; I(2): high). However the pooled OR for the incidence of diarrhoea, synthesized from 6 studies, significantly favoured the use of probiotics over control (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92). Numerically, but not statistically, probiotics seem to decrease loperamide use (OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.01-6.80) and the incidence of watery stools (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.05-2.81).

Conclusions: In conclusion, probiotic supplementation shows a probable beneficial effect in the prevention, and possible benefit in the treatment, of radiation-induced diarrhoea.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources