Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:3:1371.
doi: 10.1038/srep01371.

Role of committed minorities in times of crisis

Affiliations

Role of committed minorities in times of crisis

Malgorzata Turalska et al. Sci Rep. 2013.

Abstract

The surprising social phenomena of the Arab Spring and the Occupy Wall Street movement posit the question of whether the active role of committed groups may produce political changes of significant importance. Under what conditions are the convictions of a minority going to dominate the future direction of a society? We address this question with the help of a Cooperative Decision Making model (CDMM) which has been shown to generate consensus through a phase-transition process. We observe that in a system of a finite size the global consensus state is not permanent and times of crisis occur when there is an ambiguity concerning a given social issue. The correlation function within the cooperative system becomes similarly extended as it is observed at criticality. This combination of independence (free will) and long-range correlation makes it possible for very small but committed minorities to produce substantial changes in social consensus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a–c) Temporal evolution of the global order parameter for increasing values of the control parameter, K = 1.50, K = 1.62 and K = 1.66. (d) Phase transition diagram for the amplitude of the global order parameter ξ(t) as a function of the control parameter K. (e) Survival probability distribution Ψ(τ) for selected values of K: blue line corresponds to K = 1.50, red line to K = 1.62 and green line to K = 1.66. Lattice size is N = 100 × 100 nodes, and transition rate g = 0.10; all the calculation were done with periodic boundary conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scaling properties of the CDMM.
(a) Global order parameter ξeq is evaluated as a function of the coupling constant for increasing size of the lattice and data collapse is observed for rescaled variables. (b) Scaling of the global order parameter in the vicinity of the phase transition point. (c) Correlation C(r) as a function of the Euclidean distance r between nodes of the lattice for K being K = 1.50 (blue line), 1.62 (red line) and 1.66 (green line), respectively. (d) Scaling of the susceptibility in the vicinity of the critical point. Critical control parameter Kc = 1.644, β = 1/8, γ = 7/4 and ν = 1. Lattice size is N = 100 × 100 nodes, transition rate g = 0.10.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Behaviour of the CDMM on a three-dimensional simple cubic lattice.
(a–c) Temporal evolution of the global order parameter for increasing values of the coupling constant, K = 1.00, K = 1.30 and K = 1.50, respectively. (d) Phase transition curves for the CDMM evaluated on the 3D lattice of size N = L3, for three sizes of the cube. (e) Survival probability function derived from the fluctuations of the global order parameter for increasing values of the coupling constant. Plots (a–c) and (e) refer to lattice of size L = 5, plot (d) to lattice of size L = 10 and for all simulations periodic boundary conditions were used, and g = 0.10.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Temporal evolution of the correlation function C(r,t).
On each panel color map encodes spatiotemporal variability of correlation C(r,t). The middle plot shows cross-section of this map for r0 = 15 and bottom plot shows corresponding evolution of the global order parameter ξ(t). Analysis performed for K = 1.50 (a), K = 1.62 (b) and K = 1.66 (c). Lattice size is N = 100 × 100 nodes and transition rate g = 0.10.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Configuration of the lattice (a–c) and corresponding correlation function (bottom panel) for instances marked on bottom panel of Fig.4(c) by arrows.
White areas correspond to the units in state "yes" and black to the units in the state "no". Lattice size is N = 100 × 100, coupling constant is K = 1.66 and transition rate is g = 0.10.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Temporal evolution for the global order parameter in the absence of the minority is compared with its evolution once a committed minority is present.
(Left) Fluctuations of the global variable ξ(t) for K = 1.65 and the 2D lattice of size N = 100 × 100 nodes are compared with the behaviour of ξ(t) once 1% of the randomly selected nodes are kept in state "yes" at all time. (Right) The dynamics of the CDMM on the 3D lattice when a 1% committed minority is present. The studied lattice has N = 5 × 5 × 5 nodes, thus 1 node was always kept in state “+1” to realize the committed minority concept. Coupling constant is K = 1.40. In both cases transition rate is g = 0.10. Time interval τ marked on the top left panel denotes one of the global majority states. Its duration becomes significantly extended once committed minority is present, as can be seen on the bottom left panel. The time interval τyes shows strong shift in the length of positive and negative majority states due to the presence of the minority.
Figure 7
Figure 7. (Left) Mean waiting time obtained for system with no acting minorities (blue dots) increases once 1% (red dots) and 5% (orange dots) committed minority is present.
(Right) The ensemble average of 1000 independent realizations of the CDMM initialized with a random configuration formula image (blue line) is compared with those initialized with a crisis configuration formula image (red curve). Dashed lines correspond to the average value of the ensemble average in the long time limit with one standard deviation of its fluctuations added and subtracted.

Similar articles

  • Committed activists and the reshaping of status-quo social consensus.
    Mistry D, Zhang Q, Perra N, Baronchelli A. Mistry D, et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Oct;92(4):042805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042805. Epub 2015 Oct 7. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015. PMID: 26565287
  • Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities.
    Xie J, Sreenivasan S, Korniss G, Zhang W, Lim C, Szymanski BK. Xie J, et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jul;84(1 Pt 1):011130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011130. Epub 2011 Jul 22. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011. PMID: 21867136
  • The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
  • HIV/AIDS: a minority health issue.
    Cargill VA, Stone VE. Cargill VA, et al. Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;89(4):895-912. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.03.005. Med Clin North Am. 2005. PMID: 15925655 Review.
  • [The Gulf War Syndrome twenty years on].
    Auxéméry Y. Auxéméry Y. Encephale. 2013 Oct;39(5):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 23. Encephale. 2013. PMID: 23351934 Review. French.

Cited by

References

    1. Handy C. M. The Age of Unreason. (Harvard Business Review Press, 1991).
    1. Ball P. Crisis response: The new history. Nature 480, 447–448 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Vespignani A. Complex networks: The fragility of interdependency. Nature 464, 984–985 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Barrat A., Barthelemy M. & Vespignani A. Dynamical processes on complex networks. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
    1. Haken H. Cooperative phenomena in systems far from thermal equilibrium and in nonphysical systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 67–121 (1975).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources