Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;471(12):3870-4.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2880-3.

Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years

Affiliations

Oxford hip scores at 6 months and 5 years are associated with total hip revision within the subsequent 2 years

Peter Devane et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The Oxford hip score (OHS) is commonly reported in research studies as a reflection of pain and function but it is unclear whether it predicts subsequent prosthesis failure.

Questions/purposes: We determined whether OHS obtained at 6 months and 5 years after surgery predicts risk of revision within the subsequent 2 years.

Methods: We reviewed data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between January 1999 and December 2010. OHS at 6 months was available for 17,831 total hip patients. Patients were separated into four categories based on their OHS: 10,458 (59%) scored 42-48, 4726 (26%) scored 34-41, 1592 (9%) scored 27-33, and 1028 (6%) scored 0-26. Five-year OHSs were available for 3665 patients. Of these patients, 2619 (72%) scored 42-48, 657 (18%) scored 34-41, 225 (6%) scored 27-33, and 164 (4%) scored 0-26.

Results: For patients with a 6-month OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.4% in the 42-48 group, 1.0% in the 34-41 group, 1.7% in the 27-33 group, and 6.2% in the 0-27 group. For patients with 5-year OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 0.3%, 1.1%, 3.6%, and 6.1%, respectively. Increase in revision risk for the 0-27 versus the 42-48 OHS group was 15-fold at 6 months and 18-fold at 5 years.

Conclusions: Our data suggest patients with an OHS of 42-48 at 6 months need a 5-year postoperative appointment. Those patients with a 5-year OHS of 42-48 need not be followed up for a further 5 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Ahmad MA, Xypnitos FN, Giannoudis PV. Measuring hip outcomes: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.052. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332:1080. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolz KM, Crawford RW, Donnelly B, Whitehouse SL, Graves N. The cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.12.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braeken AM, Lochhaas-Gerlach JA, Gollish JD, Myles JD, Mackenzie TA. Determinants of 6–12 month postoperative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997;9:413–418. - PubMed
    1. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740–747. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23922. - DOI - PubMed