Clinical trial: comparative effectiveness of cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus cephalexin alone for treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 23457080
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit122
Clinical trial: comparative effectiveness of cephalexin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus cephalexin alone for treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) is the most common organism isolated from purulent skin infections. Antibiotics are usually not beneficial for skin abscess, and national guidelines do not recommend CA-MRSA coverage for cellulitis, except purulent cellulitis, which is uncommon. Despite this, antibiotics targeting CA-MRSA are prescribed commonly and increasingly for skin infections, perhaps due, in part, to lack of experimental evidence among cellulitis patients. We test the hypothesis that antibiotics targeting CA-MRSA are beneficial in the treatment of cellulitis.
Methods: We performed a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from 2007 to 2011. We enrolled patients with cellulitis, no abscesses, symptoms for <1 week, and no diabetes, immunosuppression, peripheral vascular disease, or hospitalization (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00676130). All participants received cephalexin. Additionally, each was randomized to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo. We provided 14 days of antibiotics and instructed participants to continue therapy for ≥1 week, then stop 3 days after they felt the infection to be cured. Our main outcome measure was the risk difference for treatment success, determined in person at 2 weeks, with telephone and medical record confirmation at 1 month.
Results: We enrolled 153 participants, and 146 had outcome data for intent-to-treat analysis. Median age was 29, range 3-74. Of intervention participants, 62/73 (85%) were cured versus 60/73 controls (82%), a risk difference of 2.7% (95% confidence interval, -9.3% to 15%; P = .66). No covariates predicted treatment response, including nasal MRSA colonization and purulence at enrollment.
Conclusions: Among patients diagnosed with cellulitis without abscess, the addition of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to cephalexin did not improve outcomes overall or by subgroup.
Clinical trials registration: NCT00676130.
Keywords: cellulitis; cephalexin; community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; comparative effectiveness; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
Comment in
-
Cellulitis, by any other name.Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;56(12):1763-4. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit126. Epub 2013 Mar 1. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23457076 No abstract available.
-
Use of cephalexin plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole vs cephalexin alone for treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis.Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1216-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit449. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23821731 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Chou et al.Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1217-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit450. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23821732 No abstract available.
-
Antimicrobial activity against CA-MRSA and treatment of uncomplicated nonpurulent cellulitis.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013 Aug;11(8):777-80. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2013.816470. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013. PMID: 23944241
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
