Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jan;16(1):40-5.
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12062. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

Relaparotomy for a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of different surgical strategies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Relaparotomy for a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of different surgical strategies

Gianpaolo Balzano et al. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: A relaparotomy for a pancreatic fistula (PF) after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a formidable operation, and the appropriate treatment of anastomotic leakage is under debate. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of different strategies in managing the pancreatic remnant during a relaparotomy for PF after a PD.

Methods: In this retrospective study on prospectively collected data, 669 PD were performed between 2004 and 2011. The study group comprised 31 patients requiring a relaparotomy, because of delayed haemorrhage (n = 19) or sepsis (n = 12). The pancreatic stump was treated either using pancreas-preserving techniques (simple drainage or duct occlusion) or completion of a pancreatectomy (CP). In 2008, autologous islet transplantation (AIT) was introduced for endocrine tissue rescue of CP.

Results: The mortality rate, blood loss and transfusion requirement were similar for all techniques. Patients undergoing a CP required a further relaparotomy less frequently than patients with pancreas preservation (7% versus 59%, P < 0.01), and the intensive care unit (ICU) stay was reduced after CP (P = 0.058). PF persisted at discharge in 66% of patients after pancreas-preserving techniques. AIT was associated with CP in 7 patients, of whom one died post-operatively. Long-term graft function was maintained in four out of six surviving patients, with one insulin-independent patient at 36 months after transplantation.

Conclusions: When a PF requires a relaparotomy, CP has become our favoured technique. AIT can reduce the metabolic impact of the procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, Rocchetti S, Capitanio V, Di Carlo V. Effect of hospital volume on the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:357–362. - PubMed
    1. Standop J, Glowka T, Schmitz V, Schafer N, Overhaus M, Hirner A, et al. Operative re-intervention following pancreatic head resection: indications and outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1503–1509. - PubMed
    1. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z'graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1310–1314. discussion 1315. - PubMed
    1. Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, Tavernier M, Zerbib P, Michot F, et al. Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg. 2009;197:702–709. - PubMed
    1. Dellaportas D, Tympa A, Nastos C, Psychogiou V, Karakatsanis A, Polydorou A, et al. An ongoing dispute in the management of severe pancreatic fistula: pancreatospleenectomy or not? World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2:381–384. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms