Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;15(4):245-51.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00572.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways

Mariëlle M E Coolsen  1 , Edgar M Wong-Lun-Hing, Ronald M van Dam, Aart A van der Wilt, Karem Slim, Kristoffer Lassen, Cornelis H C Dejong
Affiliations

A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways

Mariëlle M E Coolsen et al. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) or fast-track protocols have been implemented in different fields of surgery to attenuate the surgical stress response and accelerate recovery. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on outcomes of ERAS protocols applied in liver surgery.

Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies and case series published between January 1966 and October 2011 comparing adult patients undergoing elective liver surgery in an ERAS programme with those treated in a conventional manner. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay (LoS). Secondary outcome measures were time to functional recovery, and complication, readmission and mortality rates.

Results: A total of 307 articles were found, six of which were included in the review. These comprised two RCTs, three case-control studies and one retrospective case series. Median LoS ranged from 4 days in an ERAS group to 11 days in a control group. Morbidity, mortality and readmission rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Only two studies assessed time to functional recovery. Functional recovery in these studies was reached 2 days before discharge.

Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that ERAS protocols can be successfully implemented in liver surgery. Length of stay is reduced without compromising morbidity, mortality or readmission rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of studies for systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. van den Broek MA, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, Bemelmans MH, Oussoultzoglou E, Pessaux P, et al. Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in liver surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1138–1145. - PubMed
    1. Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:38–46. - PubMed
    1. Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA, Upchurch GR, Jr, Knol JA, Colletti LM. National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:31–38. - PubMed
    1. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397–407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–641. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms