Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jul;15(7):535-40.
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12004. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Focused open necrosectomy in necrotizing pancreatitis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Focused open necrosectomy in necrotizing pancreatitis

Guntars Pupelis et al. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The control of sepsis is the primary goal of surgical intervention in patients with infected necrosis. Simple surgical approaches that are easy to reproduce may improve outcomes when specialists in endoscopy are not available. The aim of the present study was to describe the experience with a focused open necrosectomy (FON) in patients with infected necrosis.

Method: A prospective pilot study conducted to compare a semi-open/closed drainage laparotomy and FON with the assistance of peri-operative ultrasound. The incidence of sepsis, dynamics of C-reactive protein (CRP), intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stay, complication rate and mortality were compared and analysed.

Results: From a total of 58 patients, 36 patients underwent a conventional open necrosectomy and 22 patients underwent FON. The latter method resulted in a faster resolution of sepsis and a significant decrease in mean CRP on Day 3 after FON, P = 0.001. Post-operative bleeding was in 1 versus 7 patients and the incidence of intestinal and pancreatic fistula was 2 versus 8 patients when comparing FON to the conventional approach. The median ICU stay was 11.6 versus 23 days and the hospital stay was significantly shorter, 57 versus 72 days, P = 0.024 when comparing FON versus the conventional group. One patient died in the FON group and seven patients died in the laparotomy group, P = 0.139.

Discussion: FON can be an alternative method to conventional open necrosectomy in patients with infected necrosis and unresolved sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Werner J, Feuerbach S, Uhl W, Buchler MW. Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut. 2005;54:426–436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley EL., 3rd A fifteen year experience with open drainage for infected pancreatic necrosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:215–222. - PubMed
    1. Beger HG, Rau BM. New advances in pancreatic surgery. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:522–534. - PubMed
    1. Götzinger P, Sautner T, Kriwanek S, Beckerhinn P, Barlan M, Armbruster C, et al. Surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis: extent and surgical control of necrosis determine outcome. World J Surg. 2002;26:474–478. - PubMed
    1. Isaji S, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Hirata K, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:48–55. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms