Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct:33:1-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

Stress-induced glucocorticoids as a neuroendocrine alarm signal of danger

Affiliations
Review

Stress-induced glucocorticoids as a neuroendocrine alarm signal of danger

Matthew G Frank et al. Brain Behav Immun. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

A considerable number of studies demonstrate that acute and chronic stressors prime CNS innate immune responses to subsequent pro-inflammatory challenges and that glucocorticoids mediate, in part, stress-induced sensitization of pro-inflammatory immune responses. Here, we explore the notion that GCs produce a persisting sensitization of CNS innate immune effectors (e.g. microglia) so that they will generate a potentiated pro-inflammatory response after the GC rise has dissipated, thereby enhancing the sickness response to infection or injury and maximizing the animal's ability to neutralize danger. The stress-induced GC response is conceptualized here as an neuroendocrine warning signal or alarmin to the innate immune system, which prepares or sensitizes the innate immune response to potential danger. Thus, a new understanding of the stress response and its function (priming CNS innate immune responses to infection or injury during a fight/flight emergency) would be suggested.

Keywords: Alarmin; Danger; Glucocorticoid; Microglia; Priming; Pro-inflammatory; Stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Glucocorticoids (GCs) as a neuroendocrine alarm signal of danger. This model of stress-induced GC action on CNS innate immunity proposes that during the initial phase of a fight/flight response, the GC rise both inhibits inflammation and initiates a process that sensitizes CNS pro-inflammatory processes. These apparently contradictory actions of GCs can be conceptualized as an opponent-process. During the initial phase of a fight/flight response, GCs induce 2 opposing processes: (1) an anti-inflammatory process that predominates while GCs are highly elevated and (2) a latent process of microglial sensitization. After GC levels decrease below a threshold and are no longer anti-inflammatory, microglia sensitization persists to prepare the organism for a subsequent immunologic threat or danger (recuperative phase). If the organism is exposed to immunologic danger, a heightened CNS innate immune response will ensue, thereby enhancing the sickness response and immunologic defense against pathogens or sterile injury.

References

    1. Aravalli RN, Peterson PK, Lokensgard JR. Toll-like receptors in defense and damage of the central nervous system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2007;2:297–312. - PubMed
    1. Avitsur R, Powell N, Padgett DA, Sheridan JF. Social interactions, stress, and immunity. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;29:285–293. - PubMed
    1. Barnum CJ, Pace TW, Hu F, Neigh GN, Tansey MG. Psychological stress in adolescent and adult mice increases neuroinflammation and attenuates the response to LPS challenge. J Neuroinflamm. 2012;9:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barton GM, Kagan JC. A cell biological view of toll-like receptor function: regulation through compartmentalization. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:535–542. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basu A, Krady JK, Levison SW. Interleukin-1: a master regulator of neuroinflammation. J Neurosci Res. 2004;78:151–156. - PubMed

Substances