Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;4(3):217-26.
doi: 10.7150/jca.5829. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Affiliations

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

Patrick E Young et al. J Cancer. 2013.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Many, if not most, cases arise from premalignant lesions (adenomas) which may be identified and removed prior to becoming frankly malignant. For over a decade, colonoscopy has been the preferred modality for both CRC screening and prevention in the US. Early reports suggested that colonoscopic screening imparted a 90% risk reduction for colorectal cancer. Subsequent studies showed that estimate to be overly optimistic. While still an outstanding CRC screening and detection tool, colonoscopy has several important limitations. Some of these limitations relate to the mechanics of the procedure such as the risk of colonic perforation, bleeding, adverse consequences of sedation, and the inability to detect all colonic polyps. Other limitations reflect issues with patient perception regarding colonoscopy which, at least in part, drive patient non-adherence to recommended testing. This review examines the literature to address several important issues. First, we analyze the effect of colonoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality. Second, we consider the patient-based, periprocedural, and intraprocedural factors which may limit colonoscopy as a screening modality. Third, we explore new techniques and technologies which may enhance the efficacy of colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Finally, we discuss the short and long-term future of colonoscopy for CRC screening and the factors which may affect this future.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; adenocarcinoma; colon cancer; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J. et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300. - PubMed
    1. Richardson LC, Tai E, Rim SH, Joseph D, Plescia M. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality-United States, 2002-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(26):884–889. - PubMed
    1. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi JM. Cost-effectiveness of colonscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:573–584. - PubMed
    1. Brenner H, Haug U, Ardnt V. et al. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10- years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterol. 2010;138:870–876. - PubMed
    1. Levine JS, Ahnen DJ. Adenomatous polyps of the colon. NEJM. 2006;355:2551–2557. - PubMed