Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;32(3):587-95.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0489.

Attributing patients to accountable care organizations: performance year approach aligns stakeholders' interests

Affiliations

Attributing patients to accountable care organizations: performance year approach aligns stakeholders' interests

Valerie A Lewis et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar.

Abstract

The accountable care organization (ACO) model of health care delivery is rapidly being implemented under government and private-sector initiatives. The model requires that each ACO have a defined patient population for which the ACO will be held accountable for both total cost of care and quality performance. However, there is no empirical evidence about the best way to define how patients are assigned to these groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers. We examined the two major methods of defining, or attributing, patient populations to ACOs: the prospective method and the performance year method. The prospective method uses data from one year to assign patients to an ACO for the following performance year. The performance year method assigns patients to an ACO at the end of the performance year based on the population served during the performance year. We used Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2008 and 2009 to simulate a set of ACOs to compare the two methods. Although both methods have benefits and drawbacks, we found that attributing patients using the performance year method yielded greater overlap of attributed patients and patients treated during the performance year and resulted in a higher proportion of care concentrated within an accountable care organization. Together, these results suggest that performance year attribution may more fully and accurately reflect an ACO's patient population and may better position an ACO to achieve shared savings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2. Comparison Of Prospective Attribution And Performance Year Attribution To Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs): Mean Population Receiving Primary Care Services From All ACO Providers
SOURCE Authors’ analysis of 100 percent Medicare fee-for-service claims data, 2008–09. NOTES “All ACO providers” includes primary care physicians, specialists, and other nonphysician providers. Sample sizes are as follows. Total patient population seen by ACO providers, Panel A: 21,231; Panel B: 21,231. Patients assigned to ACO, Panel A:11,511; Panel B: 11,437. Panel A overlap: 9,554.

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Shared Savings Program: accountable care organizations, final rule. Fed Regist. 2011;76(212):67801–990. - PubMed
    1. Lieberman S. Proposed CMS regulation kills ACOs softly. Health Affairs Blog [blog on the Internet] 2011 Apr 6; [cited 2011 Dec 13]. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/04/06/proposed-cms-regulation-kills-a...
    1. Klar R. The importance of the shared-savings ACO model. Health Affairs Blog [blog on the Internet] 2011 Jan 25; [cited 2011 Dec 13]. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/01/25/the-importance-of-the-shared-sa...
    1. Maves MD. American Medical Association CMS ACO comment letter. AMA; Chicago (IL): 2010.
    1. Ginsburg PB. Spending to save—ACOs and the Medicare Shared Savings Program. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2085–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources