Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;16(7):1229-37.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980013000505. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Neighbourhood and consumer food environment is associated with dietary intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in Fayette County, Kentucky

Affiliations

Neighbourhood and consumer food environment is associated with dietary intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants in Fayette County, Kentucky

Alison Gustafson et al. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the association between dietary outcomes and the neighbourhood food environment (street network distance from home to stores) and consumer food environment (Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey-Stores (NEMS-S) audit).

Design: The neighbourhood food environment was captured by creating 0?5-mile and 1-mile network distance (street distance) around each participant’s home and the nearest food venue (convenience store, grocery store, supermarket, farmers’ market and produce stand). The consumer food environment was captured by conducting NEMS-S in all grocery stores/supermarkets within 0?5 and 1 mile of participants’ homes.

Setting: Fayette County, KY, USA.

Subjects: Supplemental Nutrition Assessment Program (SNAP) participants, n 147.

Results: SNAP participants who lived within 0?5 mile of at least one farmers’ market/produce stand had higher odds of consuming one serving or more of vegetables (OR56?92; 95% CI 4?09, 11?69), five servings or more of grains (OR51?76; 95% CI 1?01, 3?05) and one serving or more of milk (OR53?79; 95% CI 2?14, 6?71) on a daily basis. SNAP participants who lived within 0?5 mile of stores receiving a high score on the NEMS-S audit reported higher odds of consuming at least one serving of vegetables daily (OR53?07; 95% CI 1?78, 5?31).

Conclusions: Taken together, both the neighbourhood food environment and the consumer food environment are associated with a healthy dietary intake among SNAP participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA et al. (2003) Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 289, 76–79. - PubMed
    1. Middaugh AL, Fisk PS, Brunt A et al. (2012) Few associations between income and fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 196–203. - PubMed
    1. Kaufman P, MacDonald J, Lutz S et al. (1997) Do the Poor Pay More for Food? Item Selection and Price Differences Affect Low-Income Household Food Costs. Washington, DC: Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
    1. Debono NL, Ross NA & Berrang-Ford L (2012) Does the Food Stamp Program cause obesity? A realist review and a call for place-based research. Health Place 18, 747–756. - PubMed
    1. US Department of Agriculture (2011) Program Data. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Annual State Level Data. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/snapmain.htm (accessed January 2013).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources