Elucidating the fuzziness in physician decision making in ARDS
- PMID: 23463162
- PMCID: PMC3656147
- DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9449-2
Elucidating the fuzziness in physician decision making in ARDS
Abstract
The current standard of care for patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW), but variability remains in the tidal volumes that are actually used. This study aims to identify patient scenarios for which there is discordance between physicians in choice of tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS patients. We developed an algorithm based on fuzzy logic for encapsulating the expertise of individual physicians regarding their use of tidal volume and PEEP in ARDS patients. The algorithm uses three input measurements: (1) peak airway pressure (PAP), (2) PEEP, and (3) arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂). It then generates two output parameters: (1) the deviation of tidal volume from 6 ml/kg PBW, and (2) the change in PEEP from its current value. We captured 6 realizations of intensivist expertise in this algorithm and assessed their degree of concordance using a Monte Carlo simulation. Variability in the tidal volume recommended by the algorithm increased for PAP > 30 cmH₂O and PEEP > 5 cmH₂O. Tidal volume variability decreased for SaO₂ > 90 %. Variability in the recommended change in PEEP increased for PEEP > 5 cmH₂O and for SaO₂ near 90 %. Intensivists vary in their management of ARDS patients when peak airway pressures and PEEP are high, suggesting that the current goal of 6 ml/kg PBW may need to be revisited under these conditions.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;342:1301–1308. - PubMed
-
- Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 1998;338:347–354. - PubMed
-
- Holcomb BW, Wheeler AP, Ely EW. New ways to reduce unnecessary variation and improve outcomes in the intensive care unit. Current opinion in critical care. 2001;7:304–311. - PubMed
-
- Kallet RH. Evidence-based management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory care. 2004;49:793–809. - PubMed
-
- Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, et al. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Jama. 1992;268:2420–2425. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
