Changes in use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in the United States during 1983-2009
- PMID: 23463543
- PMCID: PMC3717397
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.21997
Changes in use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in the United States during 1983-2009
Abstract
Objective: Use of nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or biologic DMARDs is generally recommended to improve the prognosis of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to describe the changing trends in DMARD use for RA over the past 2 decades.
Methods: We analyzed data from an open longitudinal cohort of RA patients recruited from rheumatologists' practices in northern California. We examined baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants and their long-term DMARD use through annual comprehensive structured telephone interviews.
Results: A total of 1,507 established RA patients were recruited through 5 enrollment periods between 1983 and 2009. Between 1983 and 2009, the use of any DMARD increased from 71% of all patients to 83% (P for trend < 0.0001). In 2009, 43% received a biologic DMARD, 34% were on both nonbiologic and biologic DMARDs, and 40% were treated with only nonbiologic DMARDs. The 4 most commonly used nonbiologic DMARDs in 2009 were methotrexate (49%), hydroxychloroquine (30%), leflunomide (13%), and sulfasalazine (7%). Etanercept (20%) was the most commonly used biologic DMARD in 2009, followed by infliximab (10%), adalimumab (9%), and abatacept (6%). Use of oral steroids was common (40-50%) and remained similar throughout the study period.
Conclusion: There has been a significant increase in the use of DMARDs for RA over the past 2 decades. However, 15% of the individuals with a clinical diagnosis of RA were not receiving DMARDs in 2009. Future research should focus on sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with DMARD use for RA.
Copyright © 2013 by the American College of Rheumatology.
Conflict of interest statement
Kim has received research support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America and Pfizer and tuition support for the Pharmacoepidemiology Program at the Harvard School of Public Health funded by Pfizer and Asisa.
Solomon received research support from Abbott Immunology, Amgen and Lilly. He serves in unpaid roles on two analgesic trials sponsored by Pfizer.
Figures
References
-
- Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:762–84. - PubMed
-
- Schmajuk G, Schneeweiss S, Katz JN, et al. Treatment of older adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: improved but not optimal. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:928–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- P60 AR053308/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- R21-DE-018750/DE/NIDCR NIH HHS/United States
- P60-AR-047782/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- K23-AR-059677/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- P60 AR047782/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- R21 DE018750/DE/NIDCR NIH HHS/United States
- K24-AR-055989/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- K24 AR055989/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- K23 AR059677/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- R01-AR-056215/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AR056215/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- P60-AR-053308-06/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
