Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;8(3):e57965.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057965. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appointments

Collaborators, Affiliations

End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appointments

Natalie Evans et al. PLoS One. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients' appointment of surrogate decision-makers in Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands and examines associated factors.

Methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks in four countries. GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life of 4,396 patients who died non-suddenly. Prevalences were estimated and logistic regressions were used to examine between country differences and country-specific associated patient and care factors.

Results: GP-patient discussion of treatment preferences occurred for 10%, 7%, 25% and 47% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and of Dutch patients respectively. Furthermore, 6%, 5%, 16% and 29% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and Dutch patients had a surrogate decision-maker. Despite some country-specific differences, previous GP-patient discussion of primary diagnosis, more frequent GP contact, GP provision of palliative care, the importance of palliative care as a treatment aim and place of death were positively associated with preference discussions or surrogate appointments. A diagnosis of dementia was negatively associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments.

Conclusions: The study revealed a higher prevalence of treatment preference discussions and surrogate appointments in the two northern compared to the two southern European countries. Factors associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments suggest that delaying diagnosis discussions impedes anticipatory planning, whereas early preference discussions, particularly for dementia patients, and the provision of palliative care encourage participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Hoving C, Visser A, Mullen PD, van den Borne B (2010) A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: From authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns 78: 275–281. - PubMed
    1. Bravo G, Dubois MF, Paquet M (2003) Advance directives for health care and research: Prevalence and correlates. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 17: 215. - PubMed
    1. DeLuca Havens G (2000) Differences in the execution/nonexecution of advance directives by community dwelling adults. Res Nurs Health 23: 319–333. - PubMed
    1. Ott BB (1999) Advance directives: the emerging body of research. Am J Crit Care 8: 514–519. - PubMed
    1. Gysels M, Evans N, Meñaca A, Andrew EVW, Toscani F, et al. (2012) Culture and End of Life Care: A Scoping Exercise in Seven European Countries. PLoS ONE 7 e34188. doi:34110.31371/journal.pone.0034188. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources