Pitfalls in subgroup analysis based on growth mixture models: a commentary on Van Leeuwen et al. (2012)
- PMID: 23475639
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0385-x
Pitfalls in subgroup analysis based on growth mixture models: a commentary on Van Leeuwen et al. (2012)
Abstract
Objectives: This article is a brief commentary in response to "van Leeuwen et al. (Qual Life Res 21:1499-1508, 2012)"
Methods and results: The commentary argues that in the context of mixture modeling, assigning individuals to specific subgroups for conducting a secondary set of analyses ignores the original uncertainty in group membership, thereby biasing any subsequent results and inference.
Conclusions: Alternative approaches to subgroup analysis that attempt to preserve uncertainty in group membership are discussed and illustrated.
Comment on
-
Changes in life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury during and after inpatient rehabilitation: adaptation or measurement bias?Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1499-508. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0073-7. Epub 2011 Nov 30. Qual Life Res. 2012. PMID: 22127386 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical