Laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-II B cervical carcinoma
- PMID: 23477170
- PMCID: PMC3481238
- DOI: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376266
Laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-II B cervical carcinoma
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical carcinoma.
Methods: Between August 1999 and April 2009, we performed 59 laparoscopic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies; specifically, 12 procedures were performed up to the level of the left renal vessels, and 47 procedures were performed up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. We retrospectively analyzed the pathology reports and clinical data and compared the 2 groups. The data were analyzed with a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier log-rank test, and Pearson's correlation analysis.
Results: The 2 groups did not significantly differ with respect to histologic type (P = .093), clinical stage (P = .053), tumor size (P = .383), time interval to start adjuvant therapy postoperatively (P = .064), and type of adjuvant therapy (P = .407). The blood loss (P = .131), operative time (P = .200), mean hospital stay (P = .417), and postoperative self-voiding (P = .306) did not significantly differ between the groups, with the exception of the number of harvested lymph nodes (P = .001). The disease-free survival was better in the group that underwent infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy than the group that did not (P = .017); however, the 2 groups did not differ with respect to overall survival (P = .115).
Conclusion: We suggest that laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer is feasible and safe. The rate of positive lymph nodes in infrarenal lymphadenectomy is very rare in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer did not provide additional survival benefits in this study.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Mar 2. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 28255734
-
Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;18(9):2622-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1611-9. Epub 2011 Mar 11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21394663
-
Para-aortic plus pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A single institutional experience.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 May;236:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 30889424
-
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique.Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;18(4):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 19. Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18805001 Review.
-
Upper margin of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Aug;91(8):893-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01443.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012. PMID: 22553934 Review.
Cited by
-
Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 10;11(12):3332. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123332. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743403 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Mar 2. J Robot Surg. 2018. PMID: 28255734
References
-
- Bidus MA, Elkas JC. Cervical and vaginal cancer. In: Jonathan S.B., ed. Berek's and Hacker's Gynecologic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007;1427
-
- National Comprehesive Cancer Network (2012). Cervical Cancer Version 1.2012.Available online: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp
-
- Hacker NF, Wain GV, Nicklin JL. Resection of bulky positive lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995;5:520–256 - PubMed
-
- Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomized study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350:535–540 - PubMed
-
- Querleu D. Laparoscopic paraaortic node sampling in gynecologic oncology: a preliminary experience. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49:24–29 - PubMed