Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;14(4):262-74.
doi: 10.1038/nrg3425. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species

Affiliations
Review

Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species

Asher D Cutter et al. Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Population genetics theory supplies powerful predictions about how natural selection interacts with genetic linkage to sculpt the genomic landscape of nucleotide polymorphism. Both the spread of beneficial mutations and the removal of deleterious mutations act to depress polymorphism levels, especially in low-recombination regions. However, empiricists have documented extreme disparities among species. Here we characterize the dominant features that could drive differences in linked selection among species--including roles for selective sweeps being 'hard' or 'soft'--and the concealing effects of demography and confounding genomic variables. We advocate targeted studies of closely related species to unify our understanding of how selection and linkage interact to shape genome evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A hypothetical chromosome exhibiting a ‘selection at linked sites’ pattern
Given the hypothetical recombination rate profile across the chromosome (top panel) and random variation in mutation rate, reflected in divergence at unconstrained sites (blue points, middle panel), measures of neutral polymorphism at unconstrained sites are predicted by recurrent genetic hitchhiking and background selection to be lower in chromosomal regions with lower average recombination rates (red points, middle panel). Recurrent positive or negative selection would yield a positive association between polymorphism and recombination rate (bottom panel). These hypothetical data were generated assuming background selection, but recurrent hard sweeps would yield a qualitatively similar pattern.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Modes of selection on linked genetic variation and factors affecting them
A | In the top two panel rows, horizontal lines represent haplotypes in a population at a particular genomic locus, with distinct colours representing different genetic backgrounds (compared to well-mixed reference genetic backgrounds indicated in blue). A hard sweep (Aa) involves the fixation of a single new beneficial mutation, whereas a soft sweep (Ab) involves fixation of selectively equivalent alleles that occur at intermediate frequency (i.e. on differing genetic backgrounds) in the population at the onset of selection. Adaptation by polygenic selection (Ac) causes an increase in the frequency of alleles at many loci, but selection does not necessarily drive fixation at any given locus (i.e. multiple partial sweeps). Background selection (Ad) eliminates deleterious mutations and the genetic backgrounds linked to them. Beneficial alleles are represented by circles and stars represent deleterious alleles. The chromosome segment represents a region with a uniform rate of recombination. Dotted lines in the bottom row of panels represent the equilibrium expectation for neutral polymorphism; solid curves show qualitative patterns of neutral polymorphism across the chromosome region. B Differences among species in a broad range of factors could vary the strength of observed signatures of selection at linked sites as caused by recurrent genetic hitchhiking or background selection. Arrows indicate factors associated with recombination (red), selection (blue) and population demography (purple) that tend to exacerbate the effects of linked selection; bars indicate mitigating factors. This diagram is meant as a general summary, as the details of parameter values can change the influence of some exacerbating and mitigating factors.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Taxonomic support for different signatures of selection at linked sites
Species differ in their support for how selection and recombination interact to modulate patterns of molecular evolution. Summary of species signatures of linked selection in Table 1; a given species may be included in multiple categories in the figure. Theory predicts recurrent genetic hitchhiking (RHH) to generate positive correlations of recombination rate with neutral polymorphism, the site frequency spectrum, and dN. Background selection (BGS) also is predicted to yield positive correlations of recombination rate with neutral polymorphism.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wiehe THE, Stephan W. Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:842–854. - PubMed
    1. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 1995;141:1605–1617. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. Hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genet Res. 1974;23:23–35. The classic theoretical study describing the process of genetic hitchhiking. - PubMed
    1. Hill WG, Robertson A. Effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966;8:269–294. The classic model of how linked selected loci interfere with each other’s ability to fix the favored alleles in the population. - PubMed
    1. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage to recombination. Genetics. 1974;78:737–756. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources