[Permanent implant prostate cancer brachytherapy: 2013 state-of-the art]
- PMID: 23478488
- DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2013.01.009
[Permanent implant prostate cancer brachytherapy: 2013 state-of-the art]
Abstract
With an experience of more than 25 years for the pioneers (and more than 14 years in France), permanent implant brachytherapy using iodine 125 seeds (essentially) is now recognized as a valuable alternative therapy for localized low-risk prostate cancer patients. The possible extension of the indications of exclusive brachytherapy towards selected patients in the intermediate-risk group has now been confirmed by several studies. Moreover, for the other patients in the intermediate-risk group and for the patients in the high-risk group, brachytherapy, as an addition to external radiotherapy, could represent one of the best ways to escalate the dose. Different permanent implant brachytherapy techniques have been proposed; preplanning or real-time procedure, loose or stranded seeds (or both), manual or automatic injection of the seeds. The main point here is the ability to perfectly master the procedure and to comply with the dosimetric constraints, which have been recently redefined by the international societies, such as the GEC-ESTRO group. Mid- and long-term results, which are now available in the literature, indicate relapse-free survival rates of about 90% at 5-10 years, the best results being obtained with satisfactory dosimetric data. Comparative data have shown that the incontinence and impotence rates after brachytherapy seemed to be significantly inferior to what is currently observed after surgery. However, a risk of about 3 to 5% of urinary retention is usually reported after brachytherapy, as well as an irritative urinary syndrome, which may significantly alter the quality of life of the patients, and last several months. In spite of those drawbacks, with excellent long-term results, low rates of incontinence and impotence, and emerging new indications (focal brachytherapy, salvage brachytherapy after localized failure of an external irradiation), permanent implant prostate brachytherapy can be expected to be proposed to an increasing number of patients in the next future.
Copyright © 2013 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Permanent implant prostate cancer brachytherapy].Cancer Radiother. 2008 Nov;12(6-7):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Cancer Radiother. 2008. PMID: 18829365 Review. French.
-
[Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].Magy Onkol. 2015 Jun;59(2):148-53. Epub 2015 Mar 11. Magy Onkol. 2015. PMID: 26035163 Hungarian.
-
Urethra-sparing, intraoperative, real-time planned, permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy: toxicity analysis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.037. Epub 2011 Apr 20. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. PMID: 21514068
-
Seed displacements after permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer in dependence on the prostate level.Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Oct;184(10):520-5. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1886-3. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008. PMID: 19016041
-
[Which modality for prostate brachytherapy?].Cancer Radiother. 2010 Oct;14(6-7):488-92. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Aug 17. Cancer Radiother. 2010. PMID: 20724190 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The prostate cancer focal therapy.Gland Surg. 2018 Apr;7(2):89-102. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.08. Gland Surg. 2018. PMID: 29770305 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical