Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Jul;58(1):112-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.056. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Optimal selection of asymptomatic patients for carotid endarterectomy based on predicted 5-year survival

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Optimal selection of asymptomatic patients for carotid endarterectomy based on predicted 5-year survival

Jessica B Wallaert et al. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed to prevent stroke, long-term survival is essential to ensure benefit, especially in asymptomatic patients. We examined factors associated with 5-year survival following CEA in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from 4114 isolated CEAs performed for asymptomatic stenosis across 24 centers in the Vascular Study Group of New England between 2003 and 2011 were used for this analysis. Late survival was determined with the Social Security Death Index. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for mortality within the first 5 years after CEA and to calculate a risk score for predicting 5-year survival.

Results: Overall 3- and 5-year survival after CEA in asymptomatic patients were 90% (95% CI 89%-91%) and 82% (95% CI 81%-84%), respectively. By multivariate analysis, increasing age, diabetes, smoking history, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, poor renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 or dialysis dependence), absence of statin use, and worse contralateral ICA stenosis were all associated with worse survival. Patients classified as low (27%), medium (68%), and high risk (5%) based on number of risk factors had 5-year survival rates of 96%, 80%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusions: More than four out of five asymptomatic patients selected for CEA in the Vascular Study Group of New England achieved 5-year survival, demonstrating that, overall, surgeons in our region selected appropriate patients for carotid revascularization. However, there were patients selected for surgery with high risk profiles, and our models suggest that the highest risk patients (such as those with multiple major risk factors including age ≥ 80, insulin-dependent diabetes, dialysis dependence, and severe contralateral ICA stenosis) are unlikely to survive long enough to realize a benefit of prophylactic CEA for asymptomatic stenosis. Predicting survival is important for decision making in these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Five-year survival following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic stenosis in low, medium, and high risk patients. CHF, Congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICA, internal carotid artery.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Predicted 5-year survival following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic stenosis based on calculated risk score.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Comparison of predicted 5-year survival (line) to actual 5-year survival (columns) based on calculated risk score for asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Comment in

  • Discussion.
    Darling C, Wallaert JB, Cambria R, Schneiderman J, Jordan W. Darling C, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):118-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.086. Epub 2013 Mar 7. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23478506 No abstract available.
  • Invited commentary.
    Rockman CB. Rockman CB. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):119. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.004. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23806254 No abstract available.

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [November 2011]; Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup.
    1. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–53. - PubMed
    1. Chaturvedi S. Public health impact of carotid endarterectomy. Neuroepidemiology. 1999;18:15–21. - PubMed
    1. Abbott AL. Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke. 2009;40:e573–83. - PubMed
    1. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms