Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region
- PMID: 23478992
- PMCID: PMC3853364
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2912
Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region
Abstract
Importance: Inappropriate use of colonoscopy involves unnecessary risk for older patients and consumes resources that could be used more effectively.
Objectives: To determine the frequency of potentially inappropriate colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries in Texas and to examine variation among physicians and across geographic regions.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare claims data for Texas and a 5% sample from the United States from 2000 through 2009. We identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 years or older who underwent a colonoscopy from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009.
Main outcome measures: Colonoscopies were classified as screening in the absence of a diagnosis suggesting an indication for the procedure. Screening colonoscopy was considered potentially inappropriate on the basis of patient age or occurrence too soon after colonoscopy with negative findings. The percentage of patients undergoing potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy was estimated for each colonoscopist and hospital service area.
Results: A large percentage of colonoscopies performed in older adults were potentially inappropriate: 23.4% for the overall Texas cohort and 9.9%, 38.8%, and 24.9%, respectively, in patients aged 70 to 75, 76 to 85, or 86 years or older. There was considerable variation across the 797 colonoscopists in the percentages of colonoscopies performed that were potentially inappropriate. In a multilevel model including patient sex, race or ethnicity, number of comorbid conditions, educational level, and urban or rural residence, 73 colonoscopists had percentages significantly above the mean (23.9%), ranging from 28.7% to 45.5%, and 119 had percentages significantly below the mean (23.9%), ranging from 6.7% to 18.6%. The colonoscopists with percentages significantly above the mean were more likely to be surgeons, graduates of US medical schools, medical school graduates before 1990, and higher-volume colonoscopists than those with percentages significantly below the mean. Colonoscopist rankings were fairly stable over time (2006-2007 vs 2008-2009). There was also geographic variation across Texas and the United States, with percentages ranging from 13.3% to 34.9% in Texas and from 19.5% to 30.5% across the United States.
Conclusions and relevance: Many colonoscopies performed in older adults may be inappropriate. The likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate colonoscopy depends in part on where patients live and what physician they see.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1335-43. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.212. Epub 2011 May 9. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21555653 Free PMC article.
-
Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1137-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01355.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22150580 Free PMC article.
-
Limited life expectancy among a subgroup of medicare beneficiaries receiving screening colonoscopies.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):443-450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 23973925 Free PMC article.
-
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31188154
-
An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1754-1762. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w. Epub 2022 Feb 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35212879 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Age 76 to 95 Years.J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):e670-80. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.009118. Epub 2016 May 17. J Oncol Pract. 2016. PMID: 27189357 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Low-Value Care Among Older Adults in a Large Statewide Health System.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):900-909. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19369. Epub 2025 Feb 3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025. PMID: 39898412 Free PMC article.
-
Clustering of esophageal cancer among white men in the United States.Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jan 1;32(1):doy081. doi: 10.1093/dote/doy081. Dis Esophagus. 2019. PMID: 30169649 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With the Overuse of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.Am J Med Qual. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):472-480. doi: 10.1177/1062860618764302. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Am J Med Qual. 2018. PMID: 29546768 Free PMC article.
-
Delivering high-quality and affordable care throughout the cancer care continuum.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4151-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.0651. Epub 2013 Oct 14. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24127450 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fisher DA, Galanko J, Dudley TK, Shaheen NJ. Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;5(8):991–996. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical